Three-year posttransplant graft survival in renal-transplant patients with graft function at 6 months receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine microemulsion within a triple-drug regimen
- PMID: 14688516
- DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000090865.20886.B7
Three-year posttransplant graft survival in renal-transplant patients with graft function at 6 months receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine microemulsion within a triple-drug regimen
Abstract
Background: Registry data can provide valuable information about possible treatment effects; however, pretreatment differences in patient characteristics may influence treatment assignment. Careful analysis must therefore be undertaken when evaluating treatment differences in the context of nonrandomized studies so that the impact of treatment selection bias is minimized.
Methods: A multivariable risk factor analysis of adult patients registered in the US Renal Data System who received a primary renal allograft during 1995 to 1998 was undertaken to compare 3-year graft survival using tacrolimus or Neoral with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids.
Results: In total, 9,449 patients were included (cadaveric donor n=6,011; living donor n=3,438). Patients (2,130) received tacrolimus, and 7,319 received Neoral. At 3 years posttransplant, the proportion of cadaveric donor recipients experiencing all causes of graft loss was 10.0% for tacrolimus and 10.6% for Neoral; for living donor recipients these figures were 6.5% and 6.7%, respectively (unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis). The incidence of graft failure excluding death was also similar between the two groups. With Cox proportional hazards modeling, the adjusted relative hazard of 3-year graft failure for cadaveric donor patients taking tacrolimus versus Neoral was 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-1.3), and for living-donor recipients it was 1.15 (95% CI 0.8-1.8).
Conclusions: These results indicate excellent 3-year graft survival for both cadaveric and living-donor renal-transplant patients receiving either Neoral or tacrolimus with MMF and steroids, with no significant differences between treatment groups. On the basis of these results, relative cost-effectiveness may become increasingly important in selection of tacrolimus or Neoral as primary immunosuppressant for renal-transplant patients.
Similar articles
-
Annual trends and triple therapy--1991-2000.Clin Transpl. 2001:247-69. Clin Transpl. 2001. PMID: 12211788
-
Frequency and severity of acute rejection in live- versus cadaveric-donor renal transplants.Transplantation. 2003 Nov 27;76(10):1452-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000083895.64198.10. Transplantation. 2003. PMID: 14657685
-
12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus.Liver Transpl. 2006 Oct;12(10):1464-72. doi: 10.1002/lt.20802. Liver Transpl. 2006. PMID: 17004259 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of new immunosuppressive agents on late graft outcome.Kidney Int Suppl. 1997 Dec;63:S81-3. Kidney Int Suppl. 1997. PMID: 9407429 Review.
-
Pharmacoeconomics of Neoral, a new formulation of cyclosporine, in renal transplantation.Transplant Proc. 1996 Dec;28(6):3131-4. Transplant Proc. 1996. PMID: 8962213 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Comparison of tacrolimus with a cyclosporine microemulsion for immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation.Turk J Urol. 2013 Mar;39(1):16-21. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.004. Turk J Urol. 2013. PMID: 26328072 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the cost effectiveness of sirolimus versus tacrolimus for immunosuppression following renal transplantation in the UK.Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(1):67-79. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624010-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006. PMID: 16445304
-
Costs and Outcomes of Privately-Insured Kidney Transplant Recipients by Body Mass Index.J Nephrol Ther. 2012;Suppl 4(SI Kidney Transplantation):003. doi: 10.4172/2161-0959.S4-003. Epub 2012 Jan 18. J Nephrol Ther. 2012. PMID: 32879752 Free PMC article.
-
Lifetime cost-effectiveness of calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal after de novo renal transplantation.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Sep;19(9):1807-16. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007040495. Epub 2008 Jun 18. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008. PMID: 18562571 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical