In vitro pharmacodynamic activities of ABT-492, a novel quinolone, compared to those of levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis
- PMID: 14693540
- PMCID: PMC310166
- DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.1.203-208.2004
In vitro pharmacodynamic activities of ABT-492, a novel quinolone, compared to those of levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis
Abstract
ABT-492 is a novel quinolone with potent activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, and atypical pathogens, making this compound an ideal candidate for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. We therefore compared the in vitro pharmacodynamic activity of ABT-492 to that of levofloxacin, an antibiotic commonly used for the treatment of pneumonia, through MIC determination and time-kill kinetic analysis. ABT-492 demonstrated potent activity against penicillin-sensitive, penicillin-resistant, and levofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains (MICs ranging from 0.0078 to 0.125 micro g/ml); beta-lactamase-positive and beta-lactamase-negative Haemophilus influenzae strains (MICs ranging from 0.000313 to 0.00125 micro g/ml); and beta-lactamase-positive and beta-lactamase-negative Moraxella catarrhalis strains (MICs ranging from 0.001 to 0.0025 micro g/ml), with MICs being much lower than those of levofloxacin. Both ABT-492 and levofloxacin demonstrated concentration-dependent bactericidal activities in time-kill kinetics studies at four and eight times the MIC with 10 of 12 bacterial isolates exposed to ABT-492 and with 12 of 12 bacterial isolates exposed to levofloxacin. Sigmoidal maximal-effect models support concentration-dependent bactericidal activity. The model predicts that 50% of maximal activity can be achieved with concentrations ranging from one to two times the MIC for both ABT-492 and levofloxacin and that near-maximal activity (90% effective concentration) can be achieved at concentrations ranging from two to five times the MIC for ABT-492 and one to six times the MIC for levofloxacin.
Figures


References
-
- Chen, D. K., A. McGeer, J. C. de Azavedo, D. E. Low, et al. 1999. Decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones in Canada. N. Engl. J. Med. 341:233-239. - PubMed
-
- Davidson, R., R. Cavalcanti, J. L. Brunton, D. J. Bast, J. C. de Azavedo, P. Kibsey, C. Fleming, and D. E. Low. 2002. Resistance to levofloxacin and failure of treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:747-750. - PubMed
-
- Davies, T. A., L. M. Kelly, D. B. Hoellman, L. M. Ednie, C. L. Clark, S. Bajaksouzian, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2000. Activities and postantibiotic effects of gemifloxacin compared to those of 11 other agents against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:633-639. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Empey, P. E., H. R. Jennings, A. C. Thornton, R. P. Rapp, and M. E. Evans. 2001. Levofloxacin failure in a patient with pneumococcal pneumonia. Ann. Pharmacother. 35:687-690. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases