Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jan;88(1):62-5.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.88.1.62.

Eccentricity and measurement variability and repeatability with the retinal thickness analyser

Affiliations

Eccentricity and measurement variability and repeatability with the retinal thickness analyser

E D Gilmore et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: To define the variability and repeatability of retinal thickness measurements using the retinal thickness analyser (RTA) and to elucidate any interaction between eccentricity (that is, position relative to the fovea) and variability and repeatability.

Methods: The sample comprised 20 normal subjects of mean age 33 years. Each subject attended for two visits. Repeated RTA scans were acquired centred on the fovea and for any one of the four possible non-foveal scan areas. The mean retinal thickness (+SD) was calculated for a series of concentric circular bands centred on fixation. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine any significant interaction between the variability of RTA thickness values and eccentricity.

Results: The group mean coefficient of variation and coefficient of repeatability were highest at the fovea. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed that the within test variability of RTA measurements varied significantly with eccentricity (p<0.0001). Similarly, the between test repeatability varied significantly with eccentricity (p = 0.045).

Conclusion: The significantly elevated within test variability and between test repeatability in the foveal area need to be considered when using the RTA to evaluate patients with macular disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram showing the default RTA scan locations (f  =  fovea, SN  =  superonasal, ST  =  superotemporal, IN  =  inferonasal, IT  =  inferotemporal) and the radii used for the circular band analysis (ranging from 200–3000 μm radii, centred on the fixation target, in 200 μm steps).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Group mean profile of retinal thickness (0–3000 μm) derived using the circular band analysis for visits 1 (solid circle) and 2 (open square). (B) Group mean profile of COV derived using the circular band analysis for visits 1 (solid circle) and 2 (open square). (C) Bar chart showing group mean COR derived using the circular band analysis. For graphs A and B, the error bars represent plus or minus 1 standard error of the mean (COV  =  coefficient of variation. COR  =  coefficient of repeatability).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hudson C, Flanagan JG, McLeod D. A clinical vision science perspective of the management of diabetic macular oedema. Focus on diabetic retinopathy. Ex Med 1999;6:41–4.
    1. Shahidi M, Zeimer R, Mori M. Topography of the retinal thickness in normal subjects. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1120–4. - PubMed
    1. Zeimer R, Shahidi M, Mori M, et al. A new method for rapid mapping of the retinal thickness at the posterior pole. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:1994–2001. - PubMed
    1. Landau D, Schneidman EM, Jacobovitz T, et al.. Quantitative in vivo retinal thickness measurements in healthy subjects. Ophthalmology 1997;104:639–42. - PubMed
    1. Asrani S, Zou S, d’Anna S, et al. Noninvasive mapping of the normal retinal thickness at the posterior pole. Ophthalmology 1999;106:269–73. - PubMed

Publication types