Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Mar;53(488):204-9.

Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists

Terry Porteous et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The National Health Service (NHS) intends to introduce a system of electronic transfer of prescription-related information between general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacies. The NHS Plan describes how this will be achieved.

Aim: To gather opinions of patients, GPs, and community pharmacists on the development of a system of electronic transfer of prescription-related information between GPs and community pharmacies.

Design of study: Survey combining interviews, focus groups, and postal questionnaires.

Setting: General practitioners, opinion leaders, computing experts, pharmacists, and patients. Eight hundred members of the public, 200 GPs, and 200 community pharmacists, all living in Scotland.

Method: Content-setting interviews and focus groups were conducted with purposive samples of relevant groups. Postal questionnaires were developed and sent to random samples of members of the public selected from the electoral roll, GPs, and community pharmacists.

Results: The corrected postal response rates were: 69% (patients); 74% (GPs); and 74% (community pharmacists). All three groups were generally supportive of electronic transfer of prescription-related information. Different aspects appealed to each group: patients anticipated improved convenience; GPs, better repeat prescribing; and pharmacists, an enhanced professional role. Security of patient-identifiable information was the main concern. All groups acknowledged potential benefits of a full primary care information system, but GPs and patients had reservations about allowing community pharmacists to access parts of the medical record that did not concern medication.

Conclusion: Electronic transfer of prescription-related information is likely to be acceptable to all users, but concerns about patient confidentiality and an extended role for pharmacists in prescription management need to be addressed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Apr;50(453):271-5 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):1-2 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1997 Aug 30;315(7107):524-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Nov;46(412):643-7 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Nov;46(412):649-53 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources