Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1992:16G:171-4.
doi: 10.1002/jcb.240501129.

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a premalignant lesion

Affiliations
Review

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a premalignant lesion

M K Brawer. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1992.

Abstract

Putative premalignant changes in the prostate have been recognized for a number of years. A variety of synonyms have been given to the most commonly described lesion, characterized by proliferation and dysplasia of the normal two cell layers lining prostatic acini and ductules; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the term most often used. A premalignant prostatic lesion should have morphologic features similar to invasive carcinoma (CA), a spatial association with microinvasive cancer arising from the lesion, and should occur at a greater frequency, severity and extent in organs harboring CA. Most definitively, progression from the premalignant lesion into CA should be observed over time. PIN fulfills all but the last of these requirements. High grade PIN is cytologically indistinguishable from prostate carcinoma (CAP). The major differentiating feature between PIN and CAP is the presence, although frequently disrupted, of the basal cell layer in the former. We have studied the basal cell layer in PIN using antibodies to high molecular weight cytokeratins and have found a correlation between PIN grade and the percent disruption of the basal cell layer. The cells making up PIN are phenotypically similar to those of CAP. We have used a variety of markers including cytokeratins, vimentin and the lectin Ulex euroapaeus to demonstrate this similarity. Additionally, we and others have noted decreased PIN immunoreactivity with antibodies directed against prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase. Other investigators have noted additional phenotypic similarities between PIN and CAP, including the ABH and Lewis antigens. PIN incidence and grade correlate well with the presence of CAP elsewhere in the prostate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by