Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems
- PMID: 14700715
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.012
Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems
Abstract
Individuals are increasingly involved in decisions about their health care. Shared decision making (SDM), an intervention in the clinical setting in which patients and providers collaborate in decision making, is an important approach for informing patients and involving them in their health care. However, SDM cannot bear the entire burden for informing and involving individuals. Population-oriented interventions to promote informed decision making (IDM) should also be explored. This review provides a conceptual background for population-oriented interventions to promote informed decisions (IDM interventions), followed by a systematic review of studies of IDM interventions to promote cancer screening. This review specifically asked whether IDM interventions (1) promote understanding of cancer screening, (2) facilitate participation in decision making about cancer screening at a level that is comfortable for individuals; or (3) encourage individuals to make cancer-screening decisions that are consistent with their preferences and values.Fifteen intervention arms met the intervention definition. They used small media, counseling, small-group education, provider-oriented strategies, or combinations of these to promote IDM. The interventions were generally consistent in improving individuals' knowledge about the disease, accuracy of risk perceptions, or knowledge and beliefs about the pros and cons of screening and treatment options. However, few studies evaluated whether these interventions resulted in individuals participating in decision making at a desirable level, or whether they led to decisions that were consistent with individuals' values and preferences. More research is needed on how best to promote and facilitate individuals' participation in health care. Work is especially needed on how to facilitate participation at a level desired by individuals, how to promote decisions by patients that are consistent with their preferences and values, how to perform effective and cost-effective IDM interventions for healthcare systems and providers and in community settings (outside of clinical settings), and how to implement these interventions in diverse populations (such as populations that are older, nonwhite, or disadvantaged). Finally, work is needed on the presence and magnitude of barriers to and harms of IDM interventions and how they might be avoided.
Comment in
-
Shared medical decision making. A new tool for preventive medicine.Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jan;26(1):81-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.022. Am J Prev Med. 2004. PMID: 14700716 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36194890 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36367232 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34523117 Free PMC article.
-
Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 16153352
Cited by
-
Interprofessioal collaboration among Speech Language Pathologists and Nurses in Acute Care in Pakistan.Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):489-493. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3545. Pak J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 33679937 Free PMC article.
-
US men discussing prostate-specific antigen tests with a physician.Ann Fam Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;4(5):433-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.576. Ann Fam Med. 2006. PMID: 17003144 Free PMC article.
-
Adoption and sustainability of decision support for patients facing health decisions: an implementation case study in nursing.Implement Sci. 2006 Aug 24;1:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-17. Implement Sci. 2006. PMID: 16930476 Free PMC article.
-
Communication message strategies for increasing knowledge about prostate cancer screening.J Cancer Educ. 2009;24(3):238-43. doi: 10.1080/08858190902935498. J Cancer Educ. 2009. PMID: 19526414
-
Caring for Somali women: implications for clinician-patient communication.Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jun;66(3):337-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Mar 6. Patient Educ Couns. 2007. PMID: 17337152 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous