Assessing the quality of research
- PMID: 14703546
- PMCID: PMC313908
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39
Assessing the quality of research
Erratum in
- BMJ. 2004 Sep 11;329(7466):621
Abstract
Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?
Figures
References
-
- Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College, 1963.
-
- Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, Cook DJ, Green L, Naylor CD, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users' guides to patient care. JAMA 2000;284: 1290-6. - PubMed
-
- Grant A, Chalmers I. Some research strategies for investigating aetiology and assessing the effects of clinical practice. In: Macdonald RR, ed. Scientific basis of obstetrics and gynaecology. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1985: 49-84.
-
- Vandenbroucke JP. Observational research and evidence-based medicine: What should we teach young physicians? J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51: 467-72. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources