GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 2: Clinical results
- PMID: 14703764
GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 2: Clinical results
Abstract
Ninety sites were treated by sinus augmentation therapy using only Bio-Oss (31 sites) or extraction socket and ridge augmentation therapy using only Bio-Oss beneath secured resorbable or titanium-reinforced nonresorbable membranes (59 sites). The results of core biopsies taken at different intervals were discussed in part 1 of this study. A discussion of the use of resorbable versus reinforced nonresorbable membranes as a function of defect morphology is undertaken in part 2. Secured titanium-reinforced membranes were shown to be the most ideal means by which to ensure the final morphology of the regenerated hard tissues.
Similar articles
-
GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 1: histologic results.Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):361-9. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003. PMID: 12956480
-
Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio Oss).Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Oct;18(5):620-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01389.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. PMID: 17877463
-
Bone quality at the implant site after reconstruction of a local defect of the maxillary anterior ridge with chin bone or deproteinised cancellous bovine bone.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Dec;34(8):877-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.017. Epub 2005 Jun 22. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005. PMID: 15978776 Clinical Trial.
-
Guided bone regeneration using an allograft material: review and case presentations.Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2008 Oct;20(9):551-7; quiz 558. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2008. PMID: 19113011 Review.
-
Regenerative barriers in immediate implant placement: a literature review.Implant Dent. 2008 Sep;17(3):360-71. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181813406. Implant Dent. 2008. PMID: 18784536 Review.
Cited by
-
Secondary closure of alveolar cleft with resorbable collagen membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone.Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul-Dec;6(2):165-171. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.200351. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 28299252 Free PMC article.
-
Use of autologous tooth-derived material as a graft in the post-extraction socket. Split-mouth study with radiological and histological analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04576-0. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39044178 Free PMC article.
-
A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials.Head Face Med. 2009 Jun 11;5:12. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-5-12. Head Face Med. 2009. PMID: 19519903 Free PMC article.
-
Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology-is it still a "gold standard"? A consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures.Int J Implant Dent. 2017 Dec;3(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40729-017-0084-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1. Int J Implant Dent. 2017. PMID: 28573552 Free PMC article.
-
Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review.Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2014 Oct 25;5(Suppl 2 to No 2):27-36. eCollection 2014 Oct-Dec. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2014. PMID: 25678948 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical