Linezolid for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin
- PMID: 14707572
- DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104110.74657.25
Linezolid for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of linezolid compared with vancomycin for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Staphylococcus aureus.
Design: Decision model analysis of the cost and efficacy of linezolid vs. vancomycin for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness of linezolid in terms of cost per added quality-adjusted life-year gained. Other outcomes were the marginal costs per hospital survivor and per year of life saved generated by using linezolid. Model estimates were derived from prospective trials of linezolid for ventilator-associated pneumonia and from other studies describing the costs and outcomes for ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Setting and patients: Hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients diagnosed with ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Interventions: In the model, patients received either linezolid or vancomycin.
Measurements and main results: The incremental cost-effectiveness of linezolid was calculated as the additional quality-adjusted life-years resulting from therapy with linezolid divided by the sum of the incremental costs arising because of use of linezolid (e.g., higher direct costs for linezolid, costs per in-hospital care of survivors, and posthospitalization costs). Despite its higher cost, linezolid was cost-effective for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. The cost per quality-adjusted life-year equals approximately 30,000 dollars. The model was moderately sensitive to the estimated efficacy of linezolid over vancomycin. Nonetheless, even with all inputs simultaneously skewed against, linezolid remains a cost-effective option (cost per quality-adjusted life-year approximately 100,000 dollars). Based on Monte Carlo simulation, the results of our analysis are robust across a range of model inputs and assumptions (95% confidence interval for cost per quality-adjusted life-year ranges from 23,637 dollars to 42,785 dollars).
Conclusions: Linezolid is a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Comment in
-
Caveats of evaluating costs in critical care.Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):299-300. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104928.95675.4C. Crit Care Med. 2004. PMID: 14707602 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin in the treatment of surgical site infections.Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jan;23(1):185-93. doi: 10.1185/030079906X162700. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007. PMID: 17257479 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of linezolid on economic outcomes and determinants of cost in a clinical trial evaluating patients with MRSA complicated skin and soft-tissue infections.Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;40(6):1017-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G728. Epub 2006 May 23. Ann Pharmacother. 2006. PMID: 16720705 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid, daptomycin, and vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: complicated skin and skin structure infection using Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis.Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):631-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 May 8. Value Health. 2011. PMID: 21839399
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid vs. vancomycin in treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections using a decision analytic model.Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Mar;63(3):376-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01958.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2009. PMID: 19222624 Review.
-
Pharmacologic treatment options for nosocomial pneumonia involving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Feb;41(2):235-44. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H414. Epub 2007 Feb 13. Ann Pharmacother. 2007. PMID: 17299012 Review.
Cited by
-
Linezolid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious Gram-positive infections.Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(9):945-64. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523090-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005. PMID: 16153136 Review.
-
Linezolid vs glycopeptide antibiotics for the treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Chest. 2011 May;139(5):1148-1155. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1556. Epub 2010 Sep 23. Chest. 2011. PMID: 20864609 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness and pricing of antibacterial drugs.Chem Biol Drug Des. 2015 Jan;85(1):4-13. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.12417. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2015. PMID: 25521641 Free PMC article.
-
Potential economic burden of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in the United States.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Jan;23(1):48.e9-48.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 15. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017. PMID: 27642178 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid vs vancomycin in suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia in Germany.Infection. 2009 Apr;37(2):123-32. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-8046-7. Epub 2009 Mar 9. Infection. 2009. PMID: 19277465
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources