Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Feb;28(2):166-72.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7167-5. Epub 2004 Jan 8.

Bloodless liver resection using the monopolar floating ball plus ligasure diathermy: preliminary results of 16 liver resections

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Bloodless liver resection using the monopolar floating ball plus ligasure diathermy: preliminary results of 16 liver resections

Yoshihiro Sakamoto et al. World J Surg. 2004 Feb.

Abstract

Blood loss during liver transection and ischemia-reperfusion injury associated with hepatic inflow occlusion are significant drawbacks during liver surgery. Sixteen patients underwent liver resection using the Monopolar Floating Ball (FB) plus LigaSure (LS) diathermy without occlusion of the hepatoduodenal ligament (group FB-LS). The liver parenchyma was precoagulated using the FB, and the uncovered tiny vessels were sealed using LS. Surgical outcomes were retrospectively compared with 16 well matched patients who underwent liver resection using the conventional clamp crushing method with Pringle's maneuver (group CC). The amount of blood loss during liver transection was significantly less in group FB-LS than in group CC [200 ml (0-990 ml) vs. 480 ml (120-1800 ml); p = 0.006]. The median time it took to complete the liver transection was significantly longer in group FB-LS than in group CC [144 minutes (43-335 minutes) vs. 58 minutes (18-94 minutes); p < 0.0001]. Hepatic inflow occlusion was temporally used in five patients in group FB-LS to achieve hemostasis in hepatic venous tributaries for 6, 10, 19, 26, and 61 minutes, respectively. Using these two electronic devices allows liver resection to be safely performed, with the advantage of minimal blood loss and a reduced inflow occlusion period compared to the conventional method. The major disadvantage may be a slower transection speed. A prospective randomized trial is needed to clarify the clinical benefits of liver resections performed using this novel technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Arch Surg. 1999 Sep;134(9):984-92 - PubMed
    1. Surg Today. 2000;30(10):959-62 - PubMed
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Feb;164(2):155-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 2002 Jul;137(7):833-40 - PubMed
    1. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(3):295-8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms