Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care
- PMID: 14709580
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care
Abstract
Context: Over the past century, nursing homes and hospitals increasingly have become the site of death, yet no national studies have examined the adequacy or quality of end-of-life care in institutional settings compared with deaths at home.
Objective: To evaluate the US dying experience at home and in institutional settings.
Design, setting, and participants: Mortality follow-back survey of family members or other knowledgeable informants representing 1578 decedents, with a 2-stage probability sample used to estimate end-of-life care outcomes for 1.97 million deaths from chronic illness in the United States in 2000. Informants were asked via telephone about the patient's experience at the last place of care at which the patient spent more than 48 hours.
Main outcome measures: Patient- and family-centered end-of-life care outcomes, including whether health care workers (1) provided the desired physical comfort and emotional support to the dying person, (2) supported shared decision making, (3) treated the dying person with respect, (4) attended to the emotional needs of the family, and (5) provided coordinated care.
Results: For 1059 of 1578 decedents (67.1%), the last place of care was an institution. Of 519 (32.9%) patients dying at home represented by this sample, 198 (38.2%) did not receive nursing services; 65 (12.5%) had home nursing services, and 256 (49.3%) had home hospice services. About one quarter of all patients with pain or dyspnea did not receive adequate treatment, and one quarter reported concerns with physician communication. More than one third of respondents cared for by a home health agency, nursing home, or hospital reported insufficient emotional support for the patient and/or 1 or more concerns with family emotional support, compared with about one fifth of those receiving home hospice services. Nursing home residents were less likely than those cared for in a hospital or by home hospice services to always have been treated with respect at the end of life (68.2% vs 79.6% and 96.2%, respectively). Family members of patients receiving hospice services were more satisfied with overall quality of care: 70.7% rated care as "excellent" compared with less than 50% of those dying in an institutional setting or with home health services (P<.001).
Conclusions: Many people dying in institutions have unmet needs for symptom amelioration, physician communication, emotional support, and being treated with respect. Family members of decedents who received care at home with hospice services were more likely to report a favorable dying experience.
Comment in
-
Memories of loved ones about care at the end of life.JAMA. 2004 Mar 24;291(12):1445-6; author reply 1446. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.12.1445-c. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15039410 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Vigilant at the end of life: family advocacy in the nursing home.J Palliat Med. 2010 May;13(5):573-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0398. J Palliat Med. 2010. PMID: 20420548
-
A comparison of the quality of care provided to cancer patients in the UK in the last three months of life in in-patient hospices compared with hospitals, from the perspective of bereaved relatives: results from a survey using the VOICES questionnaire.Palliat Med. 2009 Apr;23(3):190-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216309102525. Epub 2009 Feb 27. Palliat Med. 2009. PMID: 19251834
-
Symptom experiences of residents dying in assisted living.J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 May;7(4):219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.09.011. Epub 2005 Nov 23. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006. PMID: 16698507
-
Role of Hospice Care at the End of Life for People With Cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 20;38(9):937-943. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02235. Epub 2020 Feb 5. J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32023154 Review.
-
Privacy at end of life in ICU: A review of the literature.J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2274-2284. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14279. Epub 2018 Mar 26. J Clin Nurs. 2018. PMID: 29399904 Review.
Cited by
-
Underuse of hospice care by Medicaid-insured patients with stage IV lung cancer in New York and California.J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 10;31(20):2569-79. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.9271. Epub 2013 Jun 3. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23733768 Free PMC article.
-
Hospice Family Caregiver Involvement in Care Plan Meetings: A Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Nov;34(9):849-859. doi: 10.1177/1049909116661816. Epub 2016 Jul 27. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017. PMID: 27465403 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Site of death among nursing home residents in the United States: changing patterns, 2003-2007.J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Oct;14(10):741-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 May 7. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23664483 Free PMC article.
-
Hospice Enrollment, Local Hospice Utilization Patterns, and Rehospitalization in Medicare Patients.J Palliat Med. 2015 Jul;18(7):601-12. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0395. Epub 2015 Apr 16. J Palliat Med. 2015. PMID: 25879990 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of aggregate length of hospital stay in the last year of life in Switzerland.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 1;16(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1725-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27586660 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous