Re-serviced females on commercial swine breeding farms
- PMID: 14709815
- DOI: 10.1292/jvms.65.1287
Re-serviced females on commercial swine breeding farms
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to observe subsequent reproductive performance of re-serviced females by the number of services within a parity, to measure mean days to re-service and culling intervals, to determine lifetime performance in re-serviced gilts, and to investigate re-serviced females across parities on commercial farms. Reproduction records on 539 U.S.A. farms were used to observe re-serviced females by the number of service groups at the herd level. Farrowing rate decreases by approximately 10%, and re-service occurrence increases by approximately 5% for each increase in the number of services increase within a parity group (P<0.05). Only in parity 0 to 2 groups, average pigs born alive at subsequent farrowing in the second or later service groups were greater than in the first service group (P<0.05), but in parity >or=3, the third or later service groups produced fewer pigs born alive than the other service groups (P<0.05). Lifetime performance and re-service events were observed in 39945 individual females on the 149 selected farms that had complete 5-year records. Means of days to re-service, first-mating-to-culling intervals in gilts and weaning-to-culling intervals in sows were 46.3 days, 95.2 days, and 48.2 days, respectively. Re-serviced gilts had longer NPD (>50 days), a lower parity at culling (>0.5) and fewer lifetime pigs born alive (>2 pigs) than non-return gilts (P<0.05), but no difference in average pigs born alive per parity was found between re-serviced gilt groups and non-return gilts. Of 19677 re-serviced females, 35.6% had two or more re-services across parities in pig life, 10.6% had 3 or more re-services, and 1.95% had four or more re-services. Accurate estrus detection with a boar and improved mating techniques on re-serviced females are suggested to improve herd productivity.
Similar articles
-
Farm data analysis for lifetime performance components of sows and their predictors in breeding herds.Porcine Health Manag. 2020 Sep 18;6:24. doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00163-1. eCollection 2020. Porcine Health Manag. 2020. PMID: 32963803 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reproductive performance of swine females re-serviced after return to estrus or abortion.Anim Reprod Sci. 2009 Jul;113(1-4):305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jun 20. Anim Reprod Sci. 2009. PMID: 18657372
-
Longevity, lifetime pig production and productivity, and age at first conception in a cohort of gilts observed over six years on commercial farms.J Vet Med Sci. 1999 Sep;61(9):1001-5. doi: 10.1292/jvms.61.1001. J Vet Med Sci. 1999. PMID: 10535505
-
Recurrence patterns and factors associated with regular, irregular, and late return to service of female pigs and their lifetime performance on southern European farms.J Anim Sci. 2016 May;94(5):1924-32. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016-0302. J Anim Sci. 2016. PMID: 27285690
-
Effects of altrenogest on reproductive performance of gilts and sows: A meta-analysis.Anim Reprod Sci. 2018 Oct;197:10-21. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.08.035. Epub 2018 Aug 30. Anim Reprod Sci. 2018. PMID: 30197055 Review.
Cited by
-
Farm data analysis for lifetime performance components of sows and their predictors in breeding herds.Porcine Health Manag. 2020 Sep 18;6:24. doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00163-1. eCollection 2020. Porcine Health Manag. 2020. PMID: 32963803 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and herd productivity in commercial breeding herds.Porcine Health Manag. 2017 Jan 9;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40813-016-0049-7. eCollection 2017. Porcine Health Manag. 2017. PMID: 28405457 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Characteristics and risk factors for severe repeat-breeder female pigs and their lifetime performance in commercial breeding herds.Porcine Health Manag. 2017 Jun 8;3:12. doi: 10.1186/s40813-017-0059-0. eCollection 2017. Porcine Health Manag. 2017. PMID: 28603642 Free PMC article.