Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jan;89(1):F19-24.
doi: 10.1136/fn.89.1.f19.

Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff

M Cuttini  1 , V Casotto, M Kaminski, I de Beaufort, I Berbik, G Hansen, L Kollée, A Kucinskas, S Lenoir, A Levin, M Orzalesi, J Persson, M Rebagliato, M Reid, R Saracci
Affiliations

Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff

M Cuttini et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To present the views of a representative sample of neonatal doctors and nurses in 10 European countries on the moral acceptability of active euthanasia and its legal regulation.

Design: A total of 142 neonatal intensive care units were recruited by census (in the Netherlands, Sweden, Hungary, and the Baltic countries) or random sampling (in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom); 1391 doctors and 3410 nurses completed an anonymous questionnaire (response rates 89% and 86% respectively).

Main outcome measure: The staff opinion that the law in their country should be changed to allow active euthanasia "more than now".

Results: Active euthanasia appeared to be both acceptable and practiced in the Netherlands, France, and to a lesser extent Lithuania, and less acceptable in Sweden, Hungary, Italy, and Spain. More then half (53%) of the doctors in the Netherlands, but only a quarter (24%) in France felt that the law should be changed to allow active euthanasia "more than now". For 40% of French doctors, end of life issues should not be regulated by law. Being male, regular involvement in research, less than six years professional experience, and having ever participated in a decision of active euthanasia were positively associated with an opinion favouring relaxation of legal constraints. Having had children, religiousness, and believing in the absolute value of human life showed a negative association. Nurses were slightly more likely to consider active euthanasia acceptable in selected circumstances, and to feel that the law should be changed to allow it more than now.

Conclusions: Opinions of health professionals vary widely between countries, and, even where neonatal euthanasia is already practiced, do not uniformly support its legalisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Doctors' opinions and self reported practice of euthanasia (defined as the administration of drugs with the purpose of ending the patient's life). Columns represent percentages of doctors; 95% confidence intervals are shown. The values for "Have ever been involved in a decision of active euthanasia" are taken from Cuttini et al.13
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999 Sep;81(2):F84-91 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Aug 1;148(3):298-306 - PubMed
    1. J Med Ethics. 2001 Feb;27(1):5-11 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1189 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2001 Jun 9;322(7299):1376-7 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms