A new perspective on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: nerve topography and over-preservation of the cardinal ligament
- PMID: 14711985
- DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyg107
A new perspective on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: nerve topography and over-preservation of the cardinal ligament
Abstract
Background: Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was established by Japanese gynecologists. They identified two parts of the cardinal ligament, namely the vascular part and the neural part, and postulated that the neural part contained the pelvic splanchnic nerves. However, our fresh cadaver studies demonstrated that these nerves ran dorsomedially in contrast to the classical concept. The aim of this study is to further validate this finding in clinical cases.
Methods: We examined the intraoperative biopsy specimens collected from the neural part of the cardinal ligament in four patients with cervical carcinoma who underwent nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with dissection of the neural part.
Results: Careful dissections demonstrated that the pelvic splanchnic nerves arise from the dorsomedial side of the neural part at the bottom of the pararectal space. The neural part was composed of a connective tissue with focal positive staining by S-100 protein.
Conclusions: We propose that complete dissection of the cardinal ligament should be performed during nerve-sparing hysterectomy to increase its radicality.
Similar articles
-
Does the cardinal ligament of the uterus contain a nerve that should be preserved in radical hysterectomy?Anat Sci Int. 2002 Sep;77(3):161-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-7722.2002.00023.x. Anat Sci Int. 2002. PMID: 12422408
-
Nerve-Sparing Technique during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Critical Steps.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Nov-Dec;25(7):1144-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Feb 9. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29432901
-
Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III.Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Nov;79(2):154-7. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5919. Gynecol Oncol. 2000. PMID: 11063637 Clinical Trial.
-
[Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy].Ginekol Pol. 2008 Feb;79(2):92-8. Ginekol Pol. 2008. PMID: 18510087 Review. Polish.
-
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: steps to standardize surgical technique.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Sep;29(7):1203-1208. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000410. Epub 2019 Jul 19. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31326949 Review.
Cited by
-
Identification and injury to the inferior hypogastric plexus in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 13;9(1):13260. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49856-w. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31519975 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the precision surgery for cervical cancer.J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;31(3):e49. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e49. Epub 2020 Jan 21. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32266799 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 12;2(2):CD012828. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012828.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30746689 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jul;26(7):947-57. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2574-8. Epub 2014 Nov 29. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 25432634 Review.
-
Anatomy and histology of apical support: a literature review concerning cardinal and uterosacral ligaments.Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Nov;23(11):1483-94. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1819-7. Epub 2012 May 23. Int Urogynecol J. 2012. PMID: 22618209 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous