Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jan;42(1):79-82.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.79-82.2004.

Sensitivity of respiratory virus culture when screening with R-mix fresh cells

Affiliations

Sensitivity of respiratory virus culture when screening with R-mix fresh cells

James J Dunn et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

Use of R-Mix Fresh Cells has been shown to be a rapid and sensitive method for the detection and identification of respiratory viruses. We prospectively evaluated the impact of incorporation of R-Mix shell vials on the sensitivity and time to detection of seven respiratory viruses recovered in a comprehensive culture during the course of an entire respiratory season in a high-volume clinical laboratory. In this study, R-Mix shell vials were used as part of the culture of 3803 respiratory specimens. A total of 428 respiratory viruses were recovered. Staining of R-Mix vials after overnight incubation allowed initial detection of 274 of 279 influenza viruses, 33 of 38 parainfluenza viruses, 35 of 51 adenoviruses, and 52 of 60 respiratory syncytial viruses (RSVs). The time to reporting of all positive cultures after in-lab specimen receipt was 2.9 days on average and those initially detected in R-Mix cells were reported in 2.3 days on average. A combination of direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining and virus culture was performed on a subset of 711 respiratory specimens. Of 152 viruses identified, 57 were observed only with DFA testing (55 RSV and 2 influenza A viruses) and 31 were recovered only in cell culture. After overnight incubation, R-Mix cells detected 87.1% of respiratory viruses not observed by DFA testing and 96.9% of viruses positive by both methods. The sensitivities of DFA testing and R-Mix cells for identification of influenza viruses were 70.5% and 96.7%, respectively. The R-Mix method detected influenza virus in 18 samples that were negative by DFA testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barenfanger, J., C. Drake, N. Leon, T. Mueller, and T. Troutt. 2000. Clinical and financial benefits of rapid detection of respiratory viruses: an outcomes study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2824-2828. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barenfanger, J., C. Drake, T. Mueller, T. Troutt, J. O'Brien, and K. Guttman. 2001. R-mix cells are faster, at least as sensitive and marginally more costly than conventional cell lines for the detection of respiratory viruses. J. Clin. Virol. 22:101-110. - PubMed
    1. Byington, C. L., H. Castillo, K. Gerber, J. A. Daly, L. A. Brimley, S. Adams, J. C. Christenson, and A. T. Pavia. 2002. The effect of rapid respiratory viral diagnostic testing on antibiotic use in a children's hospital. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 156:1230-1234. - PubMed
    1. Dunn, J. J., C. Gordon, C. Kelley, and K. C. Carroll. 2003. Rapid detection of influenza viruses with the Denka-Seiken INFLU A•B-Quick and BD Directigen A+B kits compared to direct fluorescent stains and shell vial culture. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2180-2183. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fong, C. K. Y., M. K. Lee, and B. P. Griffith. 2000. Evaluation of R-mix fresh cells in shell vials for detection of respiratory viruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4660-4662. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources