Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jan;42(1):408-11.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.408-411.2004.

Impact of DNA polymerases and their buffer systems on quantitative real-time PCR

Affiliations

Impact of DNA polymerases and their buffer systems on quantitative real-time PCR

Petra Wolffs et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

An investigation of the influence of five DNA polymerase-buffer systems on real-time PCR showed that the choice of both DNA polymerase and the buffer system affected the amplification efficiency as well as the detection window. The analytical repeatability of the data for different systems changed clearly, leading us to conclude that basing quantitative measurements on single-data-set standard curves can lead to significant errors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Standard curves generated for five different DNA polymerase-buffer systems after two different types of analysis of the same independent triplicate data. Panels A to E show standard curves and corresponding equations when all three sets of data for each DNA polymerase were used for one analysis of DyNazyme II (A), LCTaq (B), rTth (C), Taq (D), and Tth (E). Panels F to J show standard curves and corresponding equations when the three sets of data were used for independent analysis of DyNazyme II (F), LCTaq (G), rTth (H), Taq (I), and Tth (J).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Detection probability using different DNA polymerase-buffer systems. The detection probability for each DNA concentration was determined by checking the amount of data points/total amount of analysis. Data were determined after independent triplicate experiments. —•—, DyNazyme II; --□--, LCTaq; —▴—, rTth; ——, Taq; and ---×: Tth.

References

    1. Brinkman, N. E., R. A. Haugland, L. J. Wymer, M. Byappanahalli, R. L. Whitman, and S. J. Vesper. 2003. Evaluation of a rapid, quantitative real-time PCR method for enumeration of pathogenic Candida cells in water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:1775-1782. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hein, J., U. Schellenberg, G. Bein, and H. Hackstein. 2001. Quantification of murine IFN-gamma mRNA and protein expression: impact of real-time kinetic RT-PCR using SYBR green I dye. Scand. J. Immunol. 54:285-291. - PubMed
    1. Ibekwe, A. M., and C. M. Grieve. 2003. Detection and quantification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in environmental samples by real-time PCR. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94:421-431. - PubMed
    1. Klein, D., P. Janda, R. Steinborn, M. Muller, B. Salmons, and W. H. Gunzburg. 1999. Proviral load determination of different feline immunodeficiency virus isolates using real-time polymerase chain reaction: influence of mismatches on quantification. Electrophoresis 20:291-299. - PubMed
    1. Knutsson, R., C. Löfström, H. Grage, J. Hoorfar, and P. Rådström. 2002. Modeling of 5′ nuclease real-time responses for optimization of a high-throughput enrichment PCR procedure for Salmonella enterica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:52-60. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources