Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Jan 15;10(2):155-60.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i2.155.

ATM and ATR: sensing DNA damage

Affiliations
Review

ATM and ATR: sensing DNA damage

Jun Yang et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Cellular response to genotoxic stress is a very complex process, and it usually starts with the "sensing" or "detection" of the DNA damage, followed by a series of events that include signal transduction and activation of transcription factors. The activated transcription factors induce expressions of many genes which are involved in cellular functions such as DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, and cell death. There have been extensive studies from multiple disciplines exploring the mechanisms of cellular genotoxic responses, which have resulted in the identification of many cellular components involved in this process, including the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) cascade. Although the initial activation of protein kinase cascade is not fully understood, human protein kinases ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia, mutated) and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) are emerging as potential sensors of DNA damage. Current progresses in ATM/ATR research and related signaling pathways are discussed in this review, in an effort to facilitate a better understanding of genotoxic stress response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A general schematic representation of cellular re-sponses to genotoxic stress. Ultraviolet (UV), ionizing radia-tion (IR), and various chemicals can induce DNA damage, such as double strand breaks (DSBs), which can be detected by “sensors”. This generates some signal that can be transduced by the transducers to effector molecules. Finally, there is the presence of an attenuation mechanism to control the cellular response to genotoxic stress.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regulation of p53 protein by ATM and ATR. ATM and ATR can influence the activity of p53 directly through phos-phorylation or indirectly through the action of other kinases. Furthermore, ATM can regulate p53 through phosphorylation of Mdm2 molecule, the negative regulator of p53, which can be up-regulated by p53.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The relationship between ATM and carcinogenesis.

References

    1. Yang J, Yu Y, Duerksen-Hughes PJ. Protein kinases and their involvement in the cellular responses to genotoxic stress. Mutat Res. 2003;543:31–58. - PubMed
    1. Liu Y, Guyton KZ, Gorospe M, Xu Q, Lee JC, Holbrook NJ. Differential activation of ERK, JNK/SAPK and p38/CSBP/RK map kinase family members during the cellular response to arsenite. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;21:771–781. - PubMed
    1. Liu ZG, Baskaran R, Lea-Chou ET, Wood LD, Chen Y, Karin M, Wang JY. Three distinct signalling responses by murine fibroblasts to genotoxic stress. Nature. 1996;384:273–276. - PubMed
    1. Sanchez-Prieto R, Rojas JM, Taya Y, Gutkind JS. A role for the p38 mitogen-acitvated protein kinase pathway in the transcriptional activation of p53 on genotoxic stress by chemotherapeutic agents. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2464–2472. - PubMed
    1. Kharbanda S, Saxena S, Yoshida K, Pandey P, Kaneki M, Wang Q, Cheng K, Chen YN, Campbell A, Sudha T, et al. Translocation of SAPK/JNK to mitochondria and interaction with Bcl-x(L) in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:322–327. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances