The effect of maintenance immunosuppression medication on the change in kidney allograft function
- PMID: 14717943
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00431.x
The effect of maintenance immunosuppression medication on the change in kidney allograft function
Abstract
Background: The optimum maintenance immunosuppression regimen for kidney transplant recipients is uncertain. In this study we determined the effect of maintenance immunosuppression medications on the rate of kidney allograft function loss defined by the annualized change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
Methods: We studied 40,963 first kidney only transplant recipients between 1987 and 1996 with allograft survival of at least two years in the United States Renal Data System. Linear regression methods were applied to serial GFR estimates after transplantation to determine the annualized change in GFR. Patients were classified according to the type of maintenance calcineurin and purine metabolism inhibitor received after transplantation. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the independent effect of maintenance immunosuppression medications on the annualized change in GFR (mL/min/1.73m2/year).
Results: Compared to patients who received cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), a slower decline in GFR was observed in tacrolimus-treated patients (1.60 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 1.22-1.97, P < 0.001) and patients who did not receive calcineurin inhibitors (0.82 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 0.08-1.56, P= 0.03). In contrast, compared to compared to patients who received Neoral, a faster decline in GFR was observed in patients who received the original oil-based formulation of cyclosporine (Sandimmune) (-0.16 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -0.003 to -0.32, P= 0.04) and patients with unknown calcinuerin inhibitor exposure (-2.11 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -2.27 to -1.95, P < 0.001). Compared to patients who received azathioprine, patients who received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) had a slower decline in GFR (0.61 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 0.14-1.08, P= 0.01) and patients with unknown purine metabolism inhibitor exposure had a faster decline in GFR (-0.61 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.47, P < 0.001.) In a subgroup analysis of patients who received a transplant after 1993, the decline in GFR was slower for tacrolimus compared to neoral treated patients (1.64 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 1.15-2.14, P < 0.001) but was not different for MMF compared to azathioprine-treated patients (0.24 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -0.38-0.85, P= 0.45).
Conclusion: Tacrolimus and MMF were the calcineurin inhibitor and purine metabolism inhibitor associated with the most favorable effects on rates of change in allograft function. Because most transplant recipients establish a low baseline level of allograft function, the effect of immunosuppression medication on GFR decline should be considered when selecting a maintenance immunosuppression regimen.
Comment in
-
Challenges from bias when estimating change of renal allograft function.Kidney Int. 2004 Jul;66(1):463; author reply 463-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.669_9.x. Kidney Int. 2004. PMID: 15200467 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of chronic allograft dysfunction in renal transplantation: the MYSS follow-up randomized, controlled clinical trial.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Jun;18(6):1973-85. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006101153. Epub 2007 Apr 25. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007. PMID: 17460145 Clinical Trial.
-
Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus maintenance therapy in renal allograft recipients: 24-month efficacy and safety results from the CONVERT trial.Transplantation. 2009 Jan 27;87(2):233-42. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181927a41. Transplantation. 2009. PMID: 19155978 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment strategies in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity.Pediatr Transplant. 2006 Sep;10(6):721-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00577.x. Pediatr Transplant. 2006. PMID: 16911497 Review.
-
Tacrolimus in pancreas transplantation: a multicenter analysis. Tacrolimus Pancreas Transplant Study Group.Clin Transplant. 1997 Aug;11(4):299-312. Clin Transplant. 1997. PMID: 9267719 Clinical Trial.
-
Calcineurin inhibitor-free protocols: risks and benefits.Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2007 Mar;18(1):1-23. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2007. PMID: 17237886 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term graft function changes in kidney transplant recipients.NDT Plus. 2010 Jun;3(Suppl_2):ii2-ii8. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfq063. NDT Plus. 2010. PMID: 20508857 Free PMC article.
-
Micophenolat Mofetil versus Azathioprine: effects on renal graft function in early posttransplant period.Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009 May;9(2):156-60. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2009.2836. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009. PMID: 19485949 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Trends in Kidney Function 1 Year after Kidney Transplant in the United States.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Aug;28(8):2498-2510. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016050543. Epub 2017 Mar 7. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 28270413 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with nonsignificant transplanted renal artery stenosis.BMC Nephrol. 2022 Feb 8;23(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02691-0. BMC Nephrol. 2022. PMID: 35135498 Free PMC article.
-
Does the KDIGO CKD risk stratification based on GFR and proteinuria predict kidney graft failure?Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Sep;46(9):1857-65. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0761-7. Epub 2014 Jun 20. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014. PMID: 24948201
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical