Indirect vs direct hospital quality indicators for very low-birth-weight infants
- PMID: 14722146
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.2.202
Indirect vs direct hospital quality indicators for very low-birth-weight infants
Abstract
Context: Evidence-based selective referral strategies are being used by an increasing number of insurers to ensure that medical care is provided by high-quality providers. In the absence of direct-quality measures based on patient outcomes, the standards currently in place for many conditions rely on indirect-quality measures such as patient volume.
Objectives: To assess the potential usefulness of volume as a quality indicator for very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants and compare volume with other potential indicators based on readily available hospital characteristics and patient outcomes.
Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective study of 94 110 VLBW infants weighing 501 to 1500 g born in 332 Vermont Oxford Network hospitals with neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2000.
Main outcome measures: Mortality among VLBW infants prior to discharge home; detailed case-mix adjustment was performed by using patient characteristics available immediately after birth.
Results: In hospitals with less than 50 annual admissions of VLBW infants, an additional 10 admissions were associated with an 11% reduction in mortality (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-16%; P<.001). The annual volume of admissions only explained 9% of the variation across hospitals in mortality rates, and other readily available hospital characteristics explained an additional 7%. Historical volume was not significantly related to mortality rates in 1999-2000, implying that volume cannot prospectively identify high-quality providers. In contrast, hospitals in the lowest mortality quintile between 1995 and 1998 were found to have significantly lower mortality rates in 1999-2000 (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55-0.76; P<.001) and hospitals in the highest mortality quintile between 1995 and 1998 had significantly higher mortality rates in 1999-2000 (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.16-1.64; P<.001). The percentage of hospital-level variation in mortality in 1999-2000 that was forecasted by the highest and lowest quintiles based on patient mortality was 34% compared with only 1% for the highest and lowest quintiles of volume.
Conclusions: Referral of VLBW infants based on indirect-quality indicators such as patient volume may be minimally effective. Direct measures based on patient outcomes are more useful quality indicators for the purposes of selective referral, as they are better predictors of future mortality rates among providers and could save more lives.
Similar articles
-
Hospital and patient characteristics associated with variation in 28-day mortality rates for very low birth weight infants. Vermont Oxford Network.Pediatrics. 1997 Feb;99(2):149-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.2.149. Pediatrics. 1997. PMID: 9024438
-
Relevance of hospital characteristics as performance indicators for treatment of very-low-birth-weight neonates.Eur J Public Health. 2014 Oct;24(5):739-44. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt176. Epub 2013 Nov 28. Eur J Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24293503
-
Hospital variation and risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in a population-based cohort.JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Feb;169(2):e143676. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3676. Epub 2015 Feb 2. JAMA Pediatr. 2015. PMID: 25642906
-
The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology.Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):350-9. Pediatrics. 1999. PMID: 9917477 Review.
-
[Minimum patient volume in care for very low birthweight infants: a review of the literature].Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2007 Jun;211(3):110-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-960745. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2007. PMID: 17541877 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Work environment, volume of activity and staffing in neonatal intensive care units in Italy: results of the SONAR-nurse study.Ital J Pediatr. 2016 Apr 2;42:34. doi: 10.1186/s13052-016-0247-6. Ital J Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 27039377 Free PMC article.
-
Intertwined disparities: Applying the maternal-infant dyad lens to advance perinatal health equity.Semin Perinatol. 2021 Jun;45(4):151410. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151410. Epub 2021 Mar 21. Semin Perinatol. 2021. PMID: 33865629 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Competition in medical services and the quality of care: concepts and history.Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2004 Jun;4(2):113-30. doi: 10.1023/B:IHFE.0000032419.89581.04. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2004. PMID: 15211102 Review.
-
The effects of designation and volume of neonatal care on mortality and morbidity outcomes of very preterm infants in England: retrospective population-based cohort study.BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 7;4(7):e004856. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004856. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25001393 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital Care for Newborn Babies: Quality Assessment, A Systematic Review.Iran J Pediatr. 2015 Oct;25(5):e3706. doi: 10.5812/ijp.3706. Epub 2015 Oct 6. Iran J Pediatr. 2015. PMID: 26495100 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical