Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jan-Mar;31(1):50-65.
doi: 10.1007/BF02287338.

The sensitivity of substance abuse treatment intensity to co-payment levels

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The sensitivity of substance abuse treatment intensity to co-payment levels

Anthony T Lo Sasso et al. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

This study exploits variation in co-payment levels among different contractual arrangements within a regional managed behavioral health care organization to estimate the relationship between co-payment levels for substance use treatment services and the intensity of substance use treatment. The substance use treatment benefits involved a range of co-payment levels across nearly 400 employers during the years 1993 through 1998. Multiple regression techniques were used to estimate the effect of co-payment levels on treatment intensity. The results indicate that co-payment levels had a significant negative effect on outpatient and inpatient substance use treatment. For outpatient treatment the effect on intensity implied a co-payment elasticity of -0.18, implying that moving from a $10 co-payment to a $20 co-payment would result in, for example, a reduction from 5 to 4 outpatient visits per episode. However, the effect was larger for persons with combined alcohol and drug use disorders, as they exhibited a co-payment elasticity of -0.27. For inpatient days, the co-payment elasticity was considerably smaller at -0.017. Given the benefits of maintaining persons with substance use disorders in treatment, employers may have an incentive to take steps to minimize the barriers to treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1998 Aug;7(4):32-8 - PubMed
    1. J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):123-48 - PubMed
    1. J Addict Dis. 1994;13(4):115-28 - PubMed
    1. Hum Organ. 1976 Spring;35(1):65-78 - PubMed
    1. J Health Econ. 1998 Oct;17(5):557-85 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms