Comparison of single and multiple sieve methods for the determination of masticatory performance
- PMID: 14725810
- DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2003.08.007
Comparison of single and multiple sieve methods for the determination of masticatory performance
Abstract
In the majority of studies on masticatory performance, the degree of food breakdown has been determined by sieving the food with one or more sieves. The aim of the present study was to compare the results obtained with a single and a multiple sieve method, as these methods have never been compared. We analysed the chewed food of 176 dentate subjects with a single and a multiple sieve method. Furthermore, we quantified the influence of age, gender, and dental status on the masticatory performance in order to compare the sensitivity of both methods. We observed a significant influence of the number of occlusal units on the masticatory performance for both methods. The single sieve method is less reliable than the multiple sieve method if the sieve diameter is not close enough to the median particle size of the chewed food. Therefore, we recommend the multiple sieve method.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of single and multiple sieve methods for the determination of masticatory performance.Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Feb;49(2):155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2003.08.004. Arch Oral Biol. 2004. PMID: 14693210
-
Masticatory efficiency in individuals with natural dentition.Swed Dent J. 1992;16(5):191-8. Swed Dent J. 1992. PMID: 1481126
-
Relationship between jaw movement and masticatory performance in adults with natural dentition.Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(2):103-7. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2015.1048996. Epub 2015 May 30. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016. PMID: 26027883
-
A simplified sieve method for determining masticatory performance using hydrocolloid material.J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Sep;30(9):927-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01080.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2003. PMID: 12950975
-
Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review.J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Oct;38(10):754-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02197.x. Epub 2011 Jan 17. J Oral Rehabil. 2011. PMID: 21241351 Review.
Cited by
-
Masticatory function after bite-raising with light-cured orthodontic band cement in healthy adults.Angle Orthod. 2020 Mar;90(2):263-268. doi: 10.2319/021519-112.1. Epub 2019 Aug 30. Angle Orthod. 2020. PMID: 31469594 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of occlusal support and perceived chewing ability on oral health-related quality of life among patients attending a private dental institution in India.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jan-Mar;17(1):15-21. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.194943. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017. PMID: 28216840 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Oropharyngeal Efficiency Between Two Popular Brands of Marie Biscuits.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1687-1693. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03709-1. Epub 2023 Mar 25. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023. PMID: 37636620 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of time and different tooth widths on masticatory efficiency and muscular activity in bilateral free-end saddles.Int Dent J. 2017 Feb;67(1):29-37. doi: 10.1111/idj.12256. Epub 2016 Sep 29. Int Dent J. 2017. PMID: 27681164 Free PMC article. English.
-
Masticatory function between chewing with and without wearing clear thermoplastic appliances.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):1343. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05054-3. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39501225 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources