The utility of a double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation in a variety of noncardiac thoracic surgical procedures

Abstract

To determine the utility of one-lung ventilation (OLV) in a variety of noncardiac thoracic surgical procedures, 200 patients were studied to document the ease of double-lumen tube (DLT) placement, associated complications, intraoperative respiratory changes, and methods for managing hypoxic events. Most tubes could be placed, repositioned when necessary, and secured within 12 minutes. By defining tube position with fiberoptic bronchoscopy, auscultatory assessment of placement was found to be incorrect in 38.0% of patients. The tip occluded the respective upper lobe orifice in 40.5% of this subgroup, the endobronchial cuff was at or above the carina in 38.7%, and in the wrong mainstem bronchus in 20.8%. During OLV, PaO2 initially fell to approximately 200 mmHg in most patients but gradually rose during the balance of the operation. Hypoxia (PaO2 less than 80 mmHg) during OLV developed in 28.5% of patients. Preoperative spirometry and arterial blood gases had no predictive value for this complication. Pulse oximetry values between 95% and 100% reliably reflected systemic arterial oxygen saturation. Hypoxia occurring during OLV was successfully reversed in 40.0% of instances by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the ventilated lung. The addition of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to the nonventilated lung reversed persistent hypoxia in virtually all cases. There was no difference in oxygenation, carbon dioxide elimination, airway pressures, or intraoperative complications noted between right and left double-lumen tubes. In conclusion, a DLT for OLV can expeditiously and safely be placed. Because auscultation for tube position is unreliable, bronchoscopic assessment of final position should be performed in every instance. Hypoxia during OLV can be detected reliably by pulse oximetry.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)