Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2004 Jan;24(1):24-9.
doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211018.

Effect of beginning recombinant erythropoietin treatment within the first week of life, among very-low-birth-weight neonates, on "early" and "late" erythrocyte transfusions: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of beginning recombinant erythropoietin treatment within the first week of life, among very-low-birth-weight neonates, on "early" and "late" erythrocyte transfusions: a meta-analysis

Anne C Kotto-Kome et al. J Perinatol. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: Erythrocyte transfusions to neonates can be categorized as "early" if given during the first 3 weeks of life and "late" if given thereafter. We used a meta-analysis to determine whether recombinant erythropoietin (rEpo) administration to very-low-birth-weight (VLBW, <1500 g) neonates, beginning in the first week of life, reduces either "early" or "late" transfusions.

Study design and methods: Studies that used a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked design were deemed acceptable. We identified 12 acceptable, relevant, clinical trials. Additional data not provided in the publications were obtained from two of the authors.

Results: The acceptable studies involved an aggregate of 561 rEpo and 529 placebo recipients. If rEpo was begun in the first week of life, the summary odds ratio (OR) for receiving any transfusion ("early" or "late") was 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34 to 0.79 (p=0.001). The OR for receiving an "early" transfusion was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.25 to 1.15; p=0.055), and the OR for receiving a "late" transfusion was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.37 to 0.83; p=0.036). Heterogeneity among studies was too great to estimate the effect of rEpo on the number of transfusions received or the volume of blood transfused (p<0.001 for the Q-test statistic). Subgroup analysis suggested that when rEpo is begun in the first week of life, neonates 1000 to 1500 g and >29 weeks are more likely to completely avoid transfusion than are extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW, <1000 g) neonates. No dose-response relationship was apparent between rEpo dose or iron dose and transfusion. No difference was apparent depending on whether the rEpo was given subcutaneously vs intravenously.

Conclusion: If rEpo is begun in the first week of life, a moderate reduction can be expected (p=0.001) in the proportion of VLBW neonates transfused. Reduction is less significant in "early" transfusion (p=0.055) than in "late" transfusion (p=0.036). Such treatment is not likely to eliminate transfusions among ELBW neonates completely.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms