Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jan 21:2:1.
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-1.

Prediction of falls using a risk assessment tool in the acute care setting

Alexandra Papaioannou  1 , William Parkinson, Richard Cook, Nicole Ferko, Esther Coker, Jonathan D Adachi
Affiliations

Prediction of falls using a risk assessment tool in the acute care setting

Alexandra Papaioannou et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: The British STRATIFY tool was previously developed to predict falls in hospital. Although the tool has several strengths, certain limitations exist which may not allow generalizability to a Canadian setting. Thus, we tested the STRATIFY tool with some modification and re-weighting of items in Canadian hospitals.

Methods: This was a prospective validation cohort study in four acute care medical units of two teaching hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario. In total, 620 patients over the age of 65 years admitted during a 6-month period. Five patient characteristics found to be risk factors for falls in the British STRATIFY study were tested for predictive validity. The characteristics included history of falls, mental impairment, visual impairment, toileting, and dependency in transfers and mobility. Multivariate logistic regression was used to obtain optimal weights for the construction of a risk score. A receiver-operating characteristic curve was generated to show sensitivities and specificities for predicting falls based on different threshold scores for considering patients at high risk.

Results: Inter-rater reliability for the weighted risk score indicated very good agreement (inter-class correlation coefficient = 0.78). History of falls, mental impairment, toileting difficulties, and dependency in transfer / mobility significantly predicted fallers. In the multivariate model, mental status was a significant predictor (P < 0.001) while history of falls and transfer / mobility difficulties approached significance (P = 0.089 and P = 0.077 respectively). The logistic regression model led to weights for a risk score on a 30-point scale. A risk score of 9 or more gave a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 60% for predicting who would fall.

Conclusion: Good predictive validity for identifying fallers was achieved in a Canadian setting using a simple-to-obtain risk score that can easily be incorporated into practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for weighted (0 – 30) and unweighted (0 – 5) risk score
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Groves JE, Lavori PW, Rosenbaum JF. Accidental injuries of hospitalized patients. A prospective cohort study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993;9:139–44. - PubMed
    1. Uden G, Nilsson B. Hip fracture frequent in hospital. Acta Orthop Scan. 1986;57:428–430. - PubMed
    1. Hendrich A, Nyhuis A, Kippenbrock T, Soja ME. Hospital falls: Development of a predictive model for clinical practice. Applied Nursing Research. 1995;8:129–139. - PubMed
    1. Stevenson B, Mills EM, Welin L, Beal KG. Falls risk factors in an acute-care setting: a retrospective study. Can J Nurs Res. 1998;30:97–111. - PubMed
    1. Chu LW, Pei CK, Chiu A, et al. Risk factors for falls in hospitalized older medical patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54:M38–M43. - PubMed

Publication types