Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2004 Feb;88(2):233-5.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.027615.

The Newcastle Control Score: a new method of grading the severity of intermittent distance exotropia

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The Newcastle Control Score: a new method of grading the severity of intermittent distance exotropia

H Haggerty et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb.

Abstract

Aim: To describe the development and application of a novel scoring system for grading the severity of intermittent distance exotropia (IDEX) and its potential application as an intervention criterion for surgical intervention.

Methods: The Newcastle Control Score (NCS) for IDEX was developed by incorporating both subjective (home control) and objective (clinic control) criteria into a scale to grade severity. The score structure described was evaluated for interobserver and test-retest reliability. To determine an optimal score threshold for surgical intervention, 170 cases of IDEX were scored retrospectively. Cure rates for surgical and non-surgical cases were then compared according to preoperative or presenting scores.

Results: Interobserver and test-test reliability were good (r = 0.82 and r = 0.89 respectively). Total cure rate with surgery was 54% and without surgery 18% (chi(2) = 23.093, df = 1, p<0.001). Significantly fewer patients with NCS >/=3 achieved cure without surgery than those with NCS 2 (chi(2) = 3.362, df = 1, p<0.047).

Conclusions: The NCS is a reliable method for grading the severity of IDEX and aids decisions regarding intervention. Patients with a score of 3 or more are unlikely to attain a cure without surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Graham P. Epidemiology of strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol 1974;58:224–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burian H, Franceschetti A. Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the classification of exodeviations. Trans Am Ophth Soc 1970;68:56–67. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Costenbader FD. The physiology and management of divergent strabismus. In: Allen JH, ed. Strabismic ophthalmic symposium. St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 1950:353.
    1. Campos E, Cipolli C. Binocularity and photophobia in intermittent exotropia. Percept Mot Skills 1992;74:1168–70. - PubMed
    1. Jampolsky A. Differential diagnostic characteristics of intermittent exotropia and true exophoria. Am Orthopt J 1954;4:48–55. - PubMed