Correlation of ureteral stone measurements by CT and plain film radiography: utility of the KUB
- PMID: 14744346
- DOI: 10.1089/089277903772036118
Correlation of ureteral stone measurements by CT and plain film radiography: utility of the KUB
Abstract
Background and purpose: The practice of utilizing helical CT to evaluate patients suspected of renal colic is increasing. Little is known about the accuracy of CT in estimating stone size or the utility of an accompanying plain abdominal radiograph (KUB film). The purpose of our study was to compare ureteral stone size estimation by helical CT and plain film and determine whether a KUB film provides additional information useful in patient management.
Patients and methods: Thirty consecutive patients (17 male, 13 female) having both a helical CT and a KUB study for evaluation of renal colic secondary to ureteral calculi comprised the study population. Calculus number, location, and dimensions were determined from these images. Stone dimensions were measured using electronic calipers on a picture archiving and communications system. Information found by KUB and CT was compared, and both sets of stone measurements were correlated with patient outcome.
Results: The mean maximal stone transverse diameter and length were similar on CT and plain film: 5.8 mm v 5.8 mm and 9.5 mm v 8.9 mm, respectively (P = 0.57 and 0.29, respectively). The mean anteroposterior stone diameter on CT of 6.8 mm was statistically greater than the transverse diameter as measured by both CT and KUB, which were 5.8 mm and 5.8 mm (P = 0.0002 and 0.0007, respectively). Eleven patients spontaneously passed their stones, while 19 patients required intervention. Patient outcome, as predicted by transverse stone width, was similar for CT and KUB data.
Conclusions: The management of patients with ureteral calculi relies on estimated stone size and the stone's potential for spontaneous passage. Stone dimensions estimated by CT are similar to the size determined by plain film radiography. Although plain film radiography does not provide information on stone dimensions beyond that obtained with CT, it does reveal precise stone location and radiolucency, data helpful in following and treating patients.
Similar articles
-
Limitations of noncontrast CT for measuring ureteral stones.J Endourol. 2003 Dec;17(10):851-4; discussion 854. doi: 10.1089/089277903772036127. J Endourol. 2003. PMID: 14744347
-
Clinical characteristics of ureteral calculi detected by nonenhanced computerized tomography after unclear results of plain radiography and ultrasonography.J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):799-802. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000081424.44254.45. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12913701
-
Does baseline radiography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder help facilitate stone management in patients presenting to the emergency department with renal colic?J Endourol. 2013 Dec;27(12):1425-30. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0183. Epub 2013 Nov 12. J Endourol. 2013. PMID: 24219633
-
Radiopacity and hounsfield attenuation of cystine urolithiasis: case series and review of the literature.J Endourol. 2014 Apr;28(4):472-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0524. Epub 2013 Dec 30. J Endourol. 2014. PMID: 24228639 Review.
-
Managing acute and chronic renal stone disease.Practitioner. 2016 Feb;260(1790):17-20, 2-3. Practitioner. 2016. PMID: 27032222 Review.
Cited by
-
Lifetime Radiation Exposure in Patients with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis.Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Sep 12;18(11):85. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0731-6. Curr Urol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28900827 Review.
-
Evaluation and follow-up of patients with urinary lithiasis: minimizing radiation exposure.Curr Urol Rep. 2010 Mar;11(2):80-6. doi: 10.1007/s11934-010-0092-x. Curr Urol Rep. 2010. PMID: 20425094 Review.
-
Imaging in pediatric urolithiasis-what's the best choice?Transl Pediatr. 2015 Jan;4(1):36-40. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4336.2015.01.01. Transl Pediatr. 2015. PMID: 26835358 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical