Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Feb;239(2):172-81.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000109150.89438.bd.

Split-liver transplantation in the United States: outcomes of a national survey

Affiliations

Split-liver transplantation in the United States: outcomes of a national survey

John F Renz et al. Ann Surg. 2004 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Assess application and outcomes of split-liver transplantation within the United States.

Summary background data: While a theoretically attractive mechanism to increase cadaver organ supply, split-liver transplantation has been infrequently applied. The American Society of Transplant Surgeons, in an attempt to gather preliminary data on split-liver transplantation, performed a data protected survey of transplant centers participating in the U.S. Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients.

Methods: Between April 2000 and May 2001, 89 surgical teams were surveyed. Elicited data included graft type, recipient status, procurement method, graft sharing, graft outcomes, recipient outcomes, and experience with cadaver, whole-organ transplantation.

Results: Eighty-three surgical teams reported data on 207 left lateral segment, 152 right trisegment, 15 left lobe, and 13 right lobe grafts. The split procedure was performed ex vivo in 54% and in situ in 46% of grafts. Complications were frequent in all graft types with biliary and vascular complications equally distributed between grafts procured by either technique. Primary nonfunction, graft failure, and recipient death correlated with transplant status.

Conclusions: Split-liver transplantation has been principally applied to adult-child pairs with at least one recipient critically ill. Biliary and vascular complications account for the majority of morbidity in grafts procured by either split technique with graft failure and recipient death observed more frequently in critically ill recipients. Enhanced utilization and improved results may be possible through improved information sharing and modification of allocation criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pichlmayr R, Ringe B, Gubernatis G. Transplantation of a donor liver to 2 recipients (splitting transplantation): a new method in the further development of segmental liver transplantation. Langenbecks Archiv Chir. 1989;373:127–130. - PubMed
    1. Bismuth H, Morino M, Castaing D, et al. Emergency orthotopic liver transplantation in two patients using one donor liver. Br J Surg. 1989;76:722–724. - PubMed
    1. Emond JC, Whitington PF, Thistlethwaite JR, et al. Transplantation of two patients with one liver: analysis of a preliminary experience with “Split Liver” grafting. Ann Surg. 1990;212:14–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V, et al. Evolution of liver transplantation in Europe. Report of the European Liver Transplant Registry. Joint Meeting of the International Liver Transplantation Society, European Liver Transplantation Association, and the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe. Berlin, Germany, July 11–13, 2001.
    1. Emond JC, Freeman RB, Renz JF, et al. Optimizing the use of donated cadaver livers: analysis and policy development to increase the application of split-liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:863–872. - PubMed