Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Dec;57(6):636-41.
doi: 10.1007/s00239-003-2513-7.

Relative rates of nucleotide substitution in frogs

Affiliations

Relative rates of nucleotide substitution in frogs

Andrew J Crawford. J Mol Evol. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

Accurate estimation of relative mutation rates of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and single-copy nuclear DNA (scnDNA) within lineages contributes to a general understanding of molecular evolutionary processes and facilitates making demographic inferences from population genetic data. The rate of divergence at synonymous sites ( K(s)) may be used as a surrogate for mutation rate. Such data are available for few organisms and no amphibians. Relative to mammals and birds, amphibian mtDNA is thought to evolve slowly, and the K(s) ratio of mtDNA to scnDNA would be expected to be low as well. Relative K(s) was estimated from a mitochondrial gene, ND2, and a nuclear gene, c-myc, using both "approximate" and likelihood methods. Three lineages of congeneric frogs were studied and this ratio was found to be approximately 16, the highest of previously reported ratios. No evidence of a low K(s) in the nuclear gene was found: c-myc codon usage was not biased, the K(s) was double the intron divergence rate, and the absolute K(s) was similar to estimates obtained here for other genes from other frog species. A high K(s) in mitochondrial vs. nuclear genes was unexpected in light of previous reports of a slow rate of mtDNA evolution in amphibians. These results highlight the need for further investigation of the effects of life history on mutation rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2000 Jan;14(1):141-51 - PubMed
    1. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 May;11(3):341-56 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Evol. 1995 Dec;41(6):1152-9 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 6;97(12):6585-90 - PubMed
    1. Bioinformatics. 1999 Feb;15(2):174-5 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources