Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials
- PMID: 14747504
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.4.470
Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials
Abstract
Context: Most children diagnosed as having leukemia become research subjects in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but little is known about how randomization is explained to or understood by parents.
Objective: To investigate physicians' explanation and parental understanding of randomization in childhood leukemia RCTs.
Design and setting: A multisite study of the informed consent communication process for RCTs of childhood leukemia. Consecutive cases were recruited from pediatric oncology inpatient wards at 6 US children's hospitals associated with major academic medical centers from July 1, 1999, until December 31, 2001. The informed consent conferences were observed and audiotaped, and the information obtained was coded and analyzed. Parents were interviewed shortly after the conference to ascertain their understanding.
Participants: Parents and members of the health care team who participated in 137 informed consent conferences for children with newly diagnosed acute leukemia.
Main outcome measures: Observed explanations of randomization and parental understanding of randomization after the consent conference.
Results: Randomization was explained by physicians in 83% of cases and a consent document was presented during the conference in 95% of cases. Interviews after the conference demonstrated that 68 (50%) of 137 parents did not understand randomization. Parents of racial minority and lower socioeconomic status were less likely to understand randomization (P<.001 for each). Discussion of specific clinical trial details and the presence of a nurse during the conference were associated with understanding. Eighty-four percent of children were enrolled in a leukemia trial.
Conclusions: Despite oral and written explanation, half of the parents in this study did not understand randomization for childhood leukemia trials. To make informed consent more effective, future research must seek to improve communication during this critical interchange.
Comment in
-
Determining the appropriateness of including children in clinical research: how thick is the ice?JAMA. 2004 Jan 28;291(4):494-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.4.494. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 14747509 No abstract available.
-
Audiotaping of informed consent.JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1699. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1699-a. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15082695 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A physician-directed intervention: teaching and measuring better informed consent.Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):1036-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181acfbcd. Acad Med. 2009. PMID: 19638769
-
The role of the consent document in informed consent for pediatric leukemia trials.Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Jul;28(4):401-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Nov 6. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007. PMID: 17196888
-
Stability of parental understanding of random assignment in childhood leukemia trials: an empirical examination of informed consent.J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):891-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.8100. J Clin Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16484698
-
Informed consent in pediatric clinical trials.Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005 Feb;17(1):20-4. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000145718.77939.b1. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005. PMID: 15659958 Review.
-
Proposals to Conduct Randomized Controlled Trials Without Informed Consent: a Narrative Review.J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1511-1518. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3780-5. Epub 2016 Jul 6. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27384536 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing children's competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study.BMC Pediatr. 2012 Sep 25;12:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-156. BMC Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 23009102 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical Challenges in Pediatric Oncology Care and Clinical Trials.Recent Results Cancer Res. 2021;218:149-173. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63749-1_11. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 34019168
-
Communication about the risks and benefits of phase I pediatric oncology trials.Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Mar;41:139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 29. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015. PMID: 25638751 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating visual imagery for participant understanding of research concepts in genomics research.J Community Genet. 2023 Feb;14(1):51-62. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00628-6. Epub 2022 Dec 19. J Community Genet. 2023. PMID: 36534338 Free PMC article.
-
Conducting reproductive research during a new childhood cancer diagnosis: ethical considerations and impact on participants.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Sep;36(9):1787-1791. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01546-2. Epub 2019 Aug 1. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019. PMID: 31372871 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical