Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jan;19(1):28-35.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30402.x.

Health care resource utilization associated with a diabetes center and a general medicine clinic

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Health care resource utilization associated with a diabetes center and a general medicine clinic

Elbert S Huang et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Studies have proposed that the features of diabetes clinics may decrease hospital utilization and costs by reducing complications and providing more efficient outpatient care. We compared the health care utilization associated with a diabetes center (DC) and a general medicine clinic (GMC).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: An urban academic medical center.

Patients/participants: Type 2 diabetes patients (N = 601) under care in a DC and GMC before March 1996.

Measurements and main results: We compared baseline patient characteristics and outpatient care for the period of March 1996 to August 1997. Using administrative data from March 1996 to October 2000, we compared the probability of a hospitalization, length of stay, costs of hospitalizations, the probability of an emergency room visit, and costs of emergency room visits. Diabetes center patients had a longer mean duration of diabetes (12 years vs 6 years, P <.01), more baseline microvascular disease (65% vs 44%, P <.01), and higher baseline glucose levels (hemoglobin A1c 8.6% vs 7.9%, P <.01) than GMC patients. Diabetes center patients received more intensive outpatient care directed toward glucose monitoring and control. In all crude and adjusted analyses of hospitalizations and emergency room visits, we found no statistically significant differences for inpatient utilization or cost outcomes comparing clinic populations.

Conclusions: Diabetes center attendance did not have a definitive positive or negative impact on inpatient resource utilization over a 4-year period. However, DC patients had more severe diabetes but no greater hospital utilization compared with GMC patients. Clear demonstration of the clinical and financial benefits of features of diabetes centers will require long-term controlled trials of interventions that promote comprehensive diabetes care, including cardiovascular prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roman SH, Harris MI. Management of diabetes mellitus from a public health perspective. Endocrinol MetabClin North Am. 1997;26:443–74. - PubMed
    1. O'Brien J, Shomphe L, Kavanagh P, Raggio G, Caro J. Direct medical costs of complications resulting from type 2 diabetes in the US. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1122–8. - PubMed
    1. Krein SL, Hayward RA, Pogach L, BootsMiller BJ. Department of Veterans Affairs’ Quality Enhancement Research Initiative for diabetes mellitus. Med Care. 2000;38(6S1):138–48. - PubMed
    1. Chin MH, Cook D, Jin L, et al. Barriers to providing diabetes care in community health centers. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:268–74. - PubMed
    1. Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ. 2000;320:569–72. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms