Use of health-related quality of life in prescribing research. Part 2: methodological considerations for the assessment of health-related quality of life in clinical trials
- PMID: 14748903
- DOI: 10.1046/j.0269-4727.2003.00520.x
Use of health-related quality of life in prescribing research. Part 2: methodological considerations for the assessment of health-related quality of life in clinical trials
Abstract
This article aims to address key methodological issues that should be considered when assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a clinical trial. These include justification for the selection of HRQoL as a primary or secondary outcome and choice of an appropriate instrument to assess HRQoL, which meets basic psychometric properties. In addition we consider ways to minimize bias within the trial through optimization of compliance and timing of assessments.
Similar articles
-
Principles of health-related quality of life: assessment in clinical trials.Epilepsia. 2002 Sep;43(9):1084-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.47501.x. Epilepsia. 2002. PMID: 12199735 Review. No abstract available.
-
Translating the science of patient-reported outcomes assessment into clinical practice.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2007;(37):5-11. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgm002. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2007. PMID: 17951224 Review.
-
Health-related quality of life measurement in symptom management trials.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2007;(37):47-52. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgm010. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2007. PMID: 17951231 Review.
-
Economic analysis alongside clinical trials. Revisiting the methodological issues.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991;7(4):561-73. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300007121. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991. PMID: 1778701
-
Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life.Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;18(3):351-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00234.x. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15147288 Review.
Cited by
-
Scales to climb borderline personalities: when science goes nowhere.Intern Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;2(4):315-7. doi: 10.1007/s11739-007-0086-y. Intern Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 18172596 No abstract available.
-
Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials: is 'in-trial' guidance lacking? a systematic review.PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060684. Epub 2013 Apr 1. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23560103 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment in clinical trials: a systematic review of guidance for trial protocol writers.PLoS One. 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e110216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110216. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25333995 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic collection of patient reported outcome research data: A checklist for clinical research professionals.Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 May;48:21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 19. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016. PMID: 27002223 Free PMC article.
-
Inconsistencies in quality of life data collection in clinical trials: a potential source of bias? Interviews with research nurses and trialists.PLoS One. 2013 Oct 4;8(10):e76625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076625. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24124580 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical