Role of mechanical environment and implant design on bone tissue differentiation: current knowledge and future contexts
- PMID: 14749084
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.09.003
Role of mechanical environment and implant design on bone tissue differentiation: current knowledge and future contexts
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate published evidence related to bone reactions to varying loading regimens and the impact of implant design on bone tissue differentiation.
Data and sources: The literature was searched for original research articles relating effect of mechanical environment on bone tissue and effects of implant design on bone biomechanics and marginal bone reactions using MEDLINE and manual tracing of references cited in key papers otherwise not elicited.
Study selection: Current literature on biomechanics of bone and dental implants as main focus and pertinent to key aspects of the review.
Conclusions: Implant design influences force transmission characteristics in peri-implant bone, but not the time-dependent marginal bone reactions. Mechanical signals affect bone tissue differentiation. Therefore, it is essential to control biomechanical loads on implants to maintain osseointegration and/or to promote early bone-implant interface healing.
Similar articles
-
Mechanobiology of bone and mechanocoupling of endosseous titanium oral implants.J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15(2):139-52. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i2.30. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005. PMID: 15777167 Review.
-
The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses--a review.J Dent. 2002 Sep-Nov;30(7-8):271-82. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00065-9. J Dent. 2002. PMID: 12554107 Review.
-
Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success.Implant Dent. 2003;12(4):306-17. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000091140.76130.a1. Implant Dent. 2003. PMID: 14752967 Review.
-
Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: influence of the bone-implant interface properties.J Biomech. 2014 Jan 3;47(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Oct 10. J Biomech. 2014. PMID: 24268798 Review.
-
In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.Adv Dent Res. 1999 Jun;13:99-119. doi: 10.1177/08959374990130012301. Adv Dent Res. 1999. PMID: 11276755 Review.
Cited by
-
Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implant-abutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis.J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 May-Jun;18(3):225-30. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000300005. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010. PMID: 20856998 Free PMC article.
-
Stress distribution on a three-unit implant-supported zirconia framework. A 3D finite element analysis and fatigue test.Oral Implantol (Rome). 2012 Jan;5(1):11-20. Epub 2012 Jul 17. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2012. PMID: 23285401 Free PMC article.
-
Micro-morphologic changes around biophysically-stimulated titanium implants in ovariectomized rats.Head Face Med. 2007 Jul 16;3:28. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-3-28. Head Face Med. 2007. PMID: 17634134 Free PMC article.
-
Esthetically driven immediate provisionalization in the anterior zone: 5-year results from a prospective study evaluating 3.0-mm-diameter tapered implants.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jul 31;28(8):460. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05832-x. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 39083185 Free PMC article.
-
Oxide layer characteristics and interfacial analysis of porcelain fused to high-gold alloy using multitechnique analysis methods.J Dent Sci. 2017 Dec;12(4):319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 4. J Dent Sci. 2017. PMID: 30895070 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources