Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004:255:17-27; discussion 27-36, 177-8.
doi: 10.1002/0470092645.ch3.

Identifying retinal disease genes: how far have we come, how far do we have to go?

Affiliations
Review

Identifying retinal disease genes: how far have we come, how far do we have to go?

Stephen P Daiger. Novartis Found Symp. 2004.

Abstract

One of the great success stories in retinal disease (RD) research in the past decade has been identification of many of the genes and mutations causing inherited retinal degeneration. To date, more than 133 RD genes have been identified, encompassing many disorders such as retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis, Usher syndrome and macular dystrophy. The most striking outcome of these findings is the exceptional heterogeneity involved: dozens of disease-causing mutations have been detected in most RD genes; mutations in many different genes can cause the same disease; and different mutations in the same gene may cause different diseases. Superimposed on this genetic heterogeneity is substantial clinical variability, even among family members with the same mutation. The RD genes involve many different pathways, and expression ranges from very limited (e.g. expressed in rod photoreceptors only) to ubiquitous. These findings raise several general questions--in addition to the extraordinary number of specific, biological problems revealed. What fraction of the patient population can now be accounted for by the known RD genes? How many more RD genes will be found, and how should we find them? Are we dealing with just a handful of disease mechanisms or are there many different routes to retinal degeneration? How will this extreme heterogeneity affect our ability to diagnose and treat patients? These questions are considered in this summary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Mapped and cloned retinal diseases 1980–2002.

References

    1. Berson EL, Grimsby JL, Adams SM, et al. Clinical features and mutations in patients with dominant retinitis pigmentosa-1 (RP1) Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2217–2224. - PubMed
    1. Bhattacharya SS, Wright AF, Clayton JF, et al. Close genetic linkage between X-linked retinitis pigmentosa and a restriction fragment length polymorphism identified by recombinant DNA probe L1.28. Nature. 1984;309:253–255. - PubMed
    1. Bowne SJ, Daiger SP, Hims MW, et al. Mutations in the RP1 gene causing autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:2121–2128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowne SJ, Sullivan LS, Blanton SH, et al. Mutations in the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1 gene (MPDH1) cause the RP10 form of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:559–568. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chader GJ. Animal models in research on retinal degenerations: past progress and future hope. Vision Res. 2002;42:393–399. - PubMed