Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Feb;80(1):30-4.
doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.004937.

Physicians' opinions about partner notification methods: case reporting, patient referral, and provider referral

Affiliations

Physicians' opinions about partner notification methods: case reporting, patient referral, and provider referral

M Hogben et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The United States has relied upon partner notification strategies to help break the chain of infection and re-infection for sexually transmitted diseases (STD). Physicians are a vital link in the system of STD control, but little is known of physician opinions about partner notification strategies.

Methods: We collected opinions about partner notification from a national probability sample of physicians in specialties diagnosing STDs. Physicians responded to 17 questions about three relevant forms of STD partner notification: patient based referral, provider based referral, and case reporting.

Results: Exploratory factor analyses showed that responses for each form of partner notification could be grouped into four categories: perceived practice norms, infection control, patient relationships, and time/money. Multivariate analyses of the factors showed that physicians endorsed patient based referral most favourably and provider based referral least favourably.

Conclusion: Physicians' opinions about partner notification strategies appear to reflect objective reality in some areas, but not in others. Strategies that improve the fit between physicians' opinions and effective notification are needed: some are discussed here.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Apr;27(4):193-200 - PubMed
    1. Aust Fam Physician. 2000 Jun;29(6):535-9 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 2000 Sep;106(3):E32 - PubMed
    1. J Reprod Med. 2001 Feb;46(2 Suppl):163-8 - PubMed
    1. Med Educ. 2001 Jun;35(6):603-8 - PubMed

Publication types