Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Feb;114(2):294-6.
doi: 10.1097/00005537-200402000-00021.

The effect of electrocautery versus cold scalpel technique on the incidence of early postoperative tonsillar pillar dehiscence after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The effect of electrocautery versus cold scalpel technique on the incidence of early postoperative tonsillar pillar dehiscence after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy

Jerald S Altman et al. Laryngoscope. 2004 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: The objective was to determine the effect of electrocautery versus cold scalpel technique on the incidence of early postoperative tonsillar pillar dehiscence after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy.

Study design: Prospective, randomized, matched-pair trial of patients undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy.

Methods: Patients undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy were randomly assigned to have the procedure performed with cold scalpel technique or with electrocautery. Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Twenty-seven patients returned for postoperative evaluation.

Results: The overall incidence of tonsillar pillar dehiscence was 38.8%. The incidence of dehiscence was 44.4% in the electrocautery group and 33.3% in the cold dissection group.

Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest that the use of electrocautery is not associated with an increase incidence of wound dehiscence compared with cold dissection. Tonsillar pillar dehiscence rate is high, regardless of dissection method.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources