Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Feb;36(1):51-7.
doi: 10.1080/0031302032000174932.

Genomic alterations in renal tumours: what have we learned in the era of comparative genomic hybridisation?

Affiliations
Review

Genomic alterations in renal tumours: what have we learned in the era of comparative genomic hybridisation?

Holger Moch. Pathology. 2004 Feb.

Abstract

One of the major challenges in cancer research is to generate molecular profiles of tumours and establish correlations between genetic changes and clinical parameters by screening technologies. The identification of tumour-specific gene targets has potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Metaphase comparative genomic hybridisation has been used to detect relative DNA-sequence copy number gains (including high-level amplifications of chromosomal regions) and copy number losses in human neoplasms. In the past, metaphase comparative genomic hybridisation has been shown to be a powerful genome-wide screening method and this has considerably advanced our understanding of renal cancer biology. Novel molecular technologies, including array-based comparative genomic hybridisation, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), cDNA and tissue microarrays will serve to facilitate further characterisation of candidate genes residing in chromosomal regions defined by metaphase comparative genomic hybridisation. This review concentrates on the application of metaphase comparative genomic hybridisation in the area of renal cancer research and summarises data obtained from comparative genomic hybridisation studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by