Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Dec;36(6):414-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.002.

Exploring semantic groups through visual approaches

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Exploring semantic groups through visual approaches

Olivier Bodenreider et al. J Biomed Inform. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives. We investigate several visual approaches for exploring semantic groups, a grouping of semantic types from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) semantic network. We are particularly interested in the semantic coherence of the groups, and we use the semantic relationships as important indicators of that coherence. Methods. First, we create a radial representation of the number of relationships among the groups, generating a profile for each semantic group. Second, we show that, in our partition, the relationships are organized around a limited number of pivot groups and that partitions created at random do not exhibit this property. Finally, we use correspondence analysis to visualize groupings resulting from the association between semantic types and the relationships. Results. The three approaches provide different views on the semantic groups and help detect potential inconsistencies. They make outliers immediately apparent, and, thus, serve as a tool for auditing and validating both the semantic network and the semantic groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Semantic types trees for Activity and Event, with semantic groups (the tree structure is represented by the indentations).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radial diagrams for semantic groups Anatomy and Physiology.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Radial diagram for semantic group Disorders.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Subsets of edges for the relationship treats (each style of line corresponds to a subset of edges: plain for DISO, dotted for LIVB).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Subsets of edges for the relationship location_of (each style of line corresponds to a subset of edges, e.g., grey and dotted for ORGA).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Correspondence analysis diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McCray AT. The scope and structure of the first version of the UMLS Semantic Network. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1990:126–30.
    1. McCray AT, Burgun A, Bodenreider O. Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity. Medinfo. 2001;10(Pt 1):216–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen Z, Perl Y, Halper M, Geller J, Gu H. Partitioning the UMLS semantic network. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2002;6(2):102–8. - PubMed
    1. Nelson SJ, Sheretz DD, Tuttle MS, Erlbaum MS. Using Meta-Card: a HyperCard browser for biomedical knowledge sources. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1990:151–4.
    1. Rindflesch TC, Fiszman M. The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36:462–77. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources