The "global settlement" with the tobacco industry: 6 years later
- PMID: 14759930
- PMCID: PMC1448231
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.218
The "global settlement" with the tobacco industry: 6 years later
Abstract
On June 20, 1997 a group of attorneys and health advocates proposed a "global settlement" of all public and private litigation against the tobacco industry. This agreement was controversial, and the subsequent implementing legislation was defeated. We sought to determine whether the global settlement represented a "missed opportunity" or a dead end. We compared the global settlement with subsequent laws, regulations, settlements, and judgments against the tobacco industry and found that other than Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco, tobacco control advocates have achieved many of the policies included in the global settlement and several beyond it. The policies that have been developed since 1997 have advanced tobacco control substantially, often beyond the provisions of the global settlement.
References
-
- Fox BJ, Lightwood J, Glantz S. A Public Health Analysis of the Proposed Resolution of Tobacco Litigation. San Francisco, Calif: Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco; 1998. Also available at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ctcre/tempus/us1998. Accessed December 18, 2003.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost and economic costs: United States, 1995–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:300–303. - PubMed
-
- Pertschuk M. Smoke in Their Eyes. Nashville, Tenn: Vanderbilt University Press; 2001.
-
- National Association of Attorney Generals. Master Settlement Agreement; 1998. Available at: http://www.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/litigation/usa.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2003.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
