Evolution of an emergency department screening questionnaire for severe acute respiratory syndrome
- PMID: 14759957
Evolution of an emergency department screening questionnaire for severe acute respiratory syndrome
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the screening tool that was used to screen for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), the three revisions that were made, and the factors that led to these revisions. On March 13, 2003, on receiving notification of an outbreak of atypical pneumonia, nurses from the study emergency department (ED) started screening patients for the disease that became known as SARS.
Methods: The ED nurses started with a simple screening tool that was incorporated into triage. The screening tool was later revised into a questionnaire. An outdoor screening station was set up and patients were subsequently screened before triage. After the patients were screened, they were assigned to different risk areas, where triage and treatment were rendered. Two further revisions were made to the questionnaire.
Results: From March 13 to May 31, 11457 patients were screened. Version One of the screening questionnaire was used to screen 72 patients from March 13 to 17, Version Two screened 93 patients from March 18 to 21, Version Three screened 2909 patients from March 22 to April 8, and Version Four screened 8383 patients from April 9 to May 31. There was a significant (p < 0.05) downward trend in the proportion of admissions. Among those discharged from the ED, 0.28% reattended and were later confirmed to have SARS.
Conclusions: The screening tool underwent three major revisions in response to new information. By keeping it relatively simple, user-friendly, and regularly updated, nurses were able to screen patients rapidly. Risk categorization ensured that no cross-infection occurred among patients and that no one contracted SARS in the ED.
Comment in
-
Crash course in decision making.Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;11(2):179-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb01431.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2004. PMID: 14759962 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Are the World Health Organisation case definitions for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome sufficient at initial assessment?Singapore Med J. 2005 Aug;46(8):414-20. Singapore Med J. 2005. PMID: 16049612
-
An emergency department response to severe acute respiratory syndrome: a prototype response to bioterrorism.Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;43(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.08.005. Ann Emerg Med. 2004. PMID: 14707933 Free PMC article.
-
Coping responses of emergency physicians and nurses to the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak.Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Apr;12(4):322-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.015. Acad Emerg Med. 2005. PMID: 15805323
-
SARS: What We Have Learned So Far ..Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):51-4; quiz 55-6. doi: 10.1097/00003465-200503000-00001. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2005. PMID: 15827424 Review.
-
Masked, but not silent.Revolution (Oakl). 2003 Jun-Jul;4(3):26-31. Revolution (Oakl). 2003. PMID: 12961842 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Respiratory hygiene in the emergency department.J Emerg Nurs. 2007 Apr;33(2):119-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2007.01.013. J Emerg Nurs. 2007. PMID: 17379028 Free PMC article.
-
Respiratory hygiene in the emergency department.Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;48(5):570-82. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.05.018. Epub 2006 Aug 23. Ann Emerg Med. 2006. PMID: 17052558 Free PMC article.
-
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in intensive care units (ICUs): limiting the risk to healthcare workers.Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2004 Aug;15(3):143-155. doi: 10.1016/j.cacc.2004.05.003. Epub 2004 Jun 26. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2004. PMID: 32288321 Free PMC article.
-
Crash course in decision making.Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;11(2):179-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb01431.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2004. PMID: 14759962 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous