Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jan;92(1):66-71.

Evaluation of five full-text drug databases by pharmacy students, faculty, and librarians: do the groups agree?

Natalie Kupferberg  1 , Lynda Jones Hartel
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of five full-text drug databases by pharmacy students, faculty, and librarians: do the groups agree?

Natalie Kupferberg et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the usefulness of five full-text drug databases as evaluated by medical librarians, pharmacy faculty, and pharmacy students at an academic health center. Study findings and recommendations are offered as guidance to librarians responsible for purchasing decisions.

Methods: Four pharmacy students, four pharmacy faculty members, and four medical librarians answered ten drug information questions using the databases AHFS Drug Information (STAT!Ref); DRUGDEX (Micromedex); eFacts (Drug Facts and Comparisons); Lexi-Drugs Online (Lexi-Comp); and the PDR Electronic Library (Micromedex). Participants noted whether each database contained answers to the questions and evaluated each database on ease of navigation, screen readability, overall satisfaction, and product recommendation.

Results: While each study group found that DRUGDEX provided the most direct answers to the ten questions, faculty members gave Lexi-Drugs the highest overall rating. Students favored eFacts. The faculty and students found the PDR least useful. Librarians ranked DRUGDEX the highest and AHFS the lowest. The comments of pharmacy faculty and students show that these groups preferred concise, easy-to-use sources; librarians focused on the comprehensiveness, layout, and supporting references of the databases.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the importance of consulting with primary clientele before purchasing databases. Although there are many online drug databases to consider, present findings offer strong support for eFacts, Lexi-Drugs, and DRUGDEX.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Questions for study participants
Figure 2
Figure 2
Database evaluation form
Figure 3
Figure 3
Database ratings by study group
Figure 4
Figure 4
Database search results by study group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Library of Medicine. Drug literature: a factual survey on “the nature and magnitude of drug literature.”. Report prepared for the study of Interagency Coordination in Drug Research and Regulation by the Subcommittee on Reorganization and International Organizations of the Senate Committee on Government Operations, 88th Cong., 1st sess., 1963. Committee Print.
    1. Brooks DJ. Rating the ethics of medical professionals. Gallup Poll Tuesday Briefing 2002 Dec 17;26–7.
    1. Cooksey JA, Knapp KK, Walton SM, and Cultice JM. Challenges to the pharmacist profession from escalating pharmaceutical demand. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Sep–Oct. 21(5):182–8. - PubMed
    1. Kruse KW. Online searching of the pharmaceutical literature. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983 Feb. 40(2):240–53. - PubMed
    1. Malone PM, Mosdell KW, Kier KL, and Stanovich JE. Drug information: a guide for pharmacists. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 2001.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources