More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table
- PMID: 1476961
More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table
Abstract
The paper illustrates the inconsistent behaviour of the Chi-Square test when applied onto 2 x 2 tables involving independent samples and a small overall sample size. The appropriateness of applying this test to a given 2 x 2 table was judged by the degree of agreement between the probability associated with a value of Chi-Square for that table and that obtained by direct application of Fisher's Exact Test. Data from two different studies were used for the illustration. For one of the tables, the two tests led to divergent conclusions about the Null Hypothesis (H degrees) being tested; and the two probabilities were found to differ quite significantly. When the same procedures were repeated for the data in another 2 x 2 table (also involving a small sample size) the two tests led to the same conclusion about Ho; and in this latter case, the two probabilities were approximately equal: thus implying good approximate accuracy of the Chi-Square test relative to the Exact Test. To avoid these unantisipated variations of results from the Chi-Square test when it is applied onto 2 x 2 tables involving small sample sizes, Fisher's Exact Test is further recommended as a definitive test, always to be resorted to for fourfold tables involving small sample sizes and independent samples.
Similar articles
-
Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.Stat Med. 2003 Dec 30;22(24):3859-71. doi: 10.1002/sim.1671. Stat Med. 2003. PMID: 14673943
-
Recommended tests for association in 2 x 2 tables.Stat Med. 2009 Mar 30;28(7):1159-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.3531. Stat Med. 2009. PMID: 19170020
-
Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?Ann Ig. 1989 May-Aug;1(3-4):417-32. Ann Ig. 1989. PMID: 2483622
-
On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2 x 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity.J Biopharm Stat. 1995 Mar;5(1):43-70. doi: 10.1080/10543409508835098. J Biopharm Stat. 1995. PMID: 7613560 Review.
-
Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.Stat Med. 1996 Jan 15;15(1):1-21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1<1::AID-SIM134>3.0.CO;2-E. Stat Med. 1996. PMID: 8614740 Review.
Cited by
-
Differential genomics output and susceptibility of Iranian patients with unilocular hydatidose.Iran J Parasitol. 2013 Oct;8(4):510-5. Iran J Parasitol. 2013. PMID: 25516730 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic Disease and Ocular Comorbidity Analysis of Geographically Isolated Federally Recognized American Indian Tribes of the Intermountain West.J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 7;9(11):3590. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113590. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 33171720 Free PMC article.
-
A novel perspective on dissemination: somatic metastasis of germ cell tumors from the central nervous system.Discov Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;16(1):1147. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02467-6. Discov Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40533624 Free PMC article.