Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation
- PMID: 1479374
- DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80076-8
Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation
Abstract
Micromotion has been shown to affect bony ingrowth into cementless components. This study was designed both to quantitate initial micromotion at the prosthesis-periacetabular bony interface and to compare different methods of commonly employed acetabular component fixations, ie, a press-fit hemispherical titanium cup, a press-fit hemispherical titanium cup with one and two dome screws, a press-fit titanium hemispherical cup with three spikes, and a cemented chromium-cobalt cup. The press-fit component without screws demonstrated the greatest motion equaling 162 microns at the ilium, 97 microns at the publis, and 54 microns at the ischium. With one and two screws placed into the dome, the mean ileal displacement decreased by 28 microns (17%) and 36 microns (22%), respectively. Dome screw placement demonstrated a minimal effect at the pubis and ischium. Compared to the press-fit component without augmentation, the tri-spike motion was less at the pubis and ischium. The cemented prosthesis provided the least amount of motion in all three areas tested. This experiment demonstrates that the ilium provides the least amount of support to immediate acetabular fixation, while the pubis (anterior column) and ischium (posterior column) provide more stability. One dome screw does not affect the stability of a hemispherical prosthetic cup significantly. A two dome screw fixation provides an added method of support at the ilium, but fails to decrease motion at the pubis or ischium significantly. The tri-spike fixation does not restrict motion at the ilium to the extent as the dome screws, but its effect at the ischium and pubis is much more pronounced. The obvious difference between initial motion seen with cemented versus uncemented components may suggest that before surgery, patients may need a period of protected weight bearing until ingrowth has occurred.