Differences in vividness ratings of perceived and imagined patterns
- PMID: 1486364
- DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02457.x
Differences in vividness ratings of perceived and imagined patterns
Abstract
The present research focuses on the different subjective experiences evoked by perceived and imagined matrices of letters of the alphabet. In three experiments adult subjects were asked to rate the vividness of a letter included in a matrix of letters which varied due to manipulations in colour, rotation and movement. Subjects were asked to observe (perceptual modality), draw and observe (drawing modality), retrieve (memory modality) or imagine (imagery modality) the matrices. For some manipulations of the critical letter (in particular, 45 degrees inclination and high contrast colour), the perceptual modality produced comparatively higher vividness ratings than the other two modalities. The perceptual effect of inclination was also duplicated with the memory modality group. It is argued that different visual processes, either immediate and pre-attentive, or sequential and attentive, may be operating under voluntary control. Although visual imagery varies in some ways from immediate visual perception, the similarities found, between the drawing and imagery modalities, on the one hand, and the perceptual and memory modalities, on the other hand, suggest that they share some common underlying processes.
Similar articles
-
Domain-specific reports of visual imagery vividness are not related to perceptual expertise.Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):733-738. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0730-4. Behav Res Methods. 2017. PMID: 27059364
-
Lateral posterior parietal activity during reality monitoring discriminations of memories of high and low perceptual vividness.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Sep;15(3):662-79. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0357-4. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 25925490
-
Evidence for the uniqueness of eidetic imagery.Percept Mot Skills. 1982 Dec;55(3 Pt 2):1219-33. doi: 10.2466/pms.1982.55.3f.1219. Percept Mot Skills. 1982. PMID: 7167317
-
Revision: is visual perception a requisite for visual imagery?Perception. 2002;31(6):717-31. doi: 10.1068/p3360. Perception. 2002. PMID: 12092798 Review.
-
Vividness of visual imagery for faces as a predictor of facial recognition memory performance: a revised view.Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Jun;76(3 Pt 2):1083-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.76.3c.1083. Percept Mot Skills. 1993. PMID: 8337049 Review.
Cited by
-
A neural network account of memory replay and knowledge consolidation.Cereb Cortex. 2022 Dec 15;33(1):83-95. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac054. Cereb Cortex. 2022. PMID: 35213689 Free PMC article.
-
Generating visual mental images: latency and vividness are inversely related.Mem Cognit. 2002 Dec;30(8):1179-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03213401. Mem Cognit. 2002. PMID: 12661850
-
Multidisciplinary Intersections on Artificial-Human Vividness: Phenomenology, Representation, and the Brain.Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 3;12(11):1495. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111495. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 36358420 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vividness of visual imagery and incidental recall of verbal cues, when phenomenological availability reflects long-term memory accessibility.Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 4;4:1. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00001. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23382719 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analytic comparison of trial- versus questionnaire-based vividness reportability across behavioral, cognitive and neural measurements of imagery.Neurosci Conscious. 2017 Apr 22;2017(1):nix006. doi: 10.1093/nc/nix006. eCollection 2017. Neurosci Conscious. 2017. PMID: 30042840 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources