Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts
- PMID: 14870873
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.08801.x
Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts
Abstract
Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: Evaluation in large incident cohorts. Secular trends in dialysis require a frequent re-examination of outcomes in patients on renal replacement modalities. We examined three large cohorts of patients initiating peritoneal dialysis (PD) in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (total of > 30,000 patients) to ascertain trends in patient outcomes, technique success, and predictors of both parameters of interest. Trends toward improved patient survival, higher technique success, and increasing use of cycler-based therapy, with more recent calendar years were noted. Age and diabetes were clear predictors of patient survival, but did not appear to influence technique success. Technique success was higher in patients on automated PD (APD) than in patients on continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD), but this difference was mostly concentrated in the first year on therapy. Patients starting PD after a failed allograft had excellent survival. We conclude that the current state of PD in the United States is characterized by improving patient outcomes, higher technique success, and a predominance of use of cycler-based therapy. Several opportunities for improving technique success amenable to practice interventions have been identified. The high success of PD in patients with failed allograft suggests that it is beneficial to utilize this modality more frequently in this patient group than current practice.
Similar articles
-
Peritoneal dialysis in the US: evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohorts.Kidney Int Suppl. 2006 Nov;(103):S21-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001912. Kidney Int Suppl. 2006. PMID: 17080107
-
Peritoneal dialysis technique success during the initial 90 days of therapy.Adv Perit Dial. 2012;28:60-3. Adv Perit Dial. 2012. PMID: 23311215
-
Superior survival of high transporters treated with automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Jun;25(6):1973-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp780. Epub 2010 Jan 22. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010. PMID: 20097847
-
Patient selection for automated peritoneal dialysis: for whom, when?Perit Dial Int. 2009 Feb;29 Suppl 2:S102-7. Perit Dial Int. 2009. PMID: 19270195 Review.
-
[Adequate peritoneal dialysis: limitations of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), place of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)].Nephrologie. 1998;19(5):239-44. Nephrologie. 1998. PMID: 9793936 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Factors Affecting Selection of a Dialysis Modality in Elderly Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study in Korea.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 27;9:919028. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.919028. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36237542 Free PMC article.
-
Peritoneal Dialysis Modality Failure in a Middle-Income Country: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Kidney Med. 2021 Feb 17;3(3):335-342.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.12.010. eCollection 2021 May-Jun. Kidney Med. 2021. PMID: 34136779 Free PMC article.
-
The Association of Effluent Ca125 with Peritoneal Dialysis Technique Failure.Perit Dial Int. 2015 Dec;35(7):683-90. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00016. Epub 2015 Jul 7. Perit Dial Int. 2015. PMID: 26152581 Free PMC article.
-
Propensity-matched mortality comparison of incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Mar;21(3):499-506. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009060635. Epub 2010 Feb 4. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010. PMID: 20133483 Free PMC article.
-
Transfers to Hemodialysis Among US Patients Initiating Renal Replacement Therapy With Peritoneal Dialysis.Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Nov;74(5):620-628. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 Jul 10. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019. PMID: 31301926 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical