Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Nov;35(5):377-84.
doi: 10.1007/BF00171816.

The molecular clock ticks regularly in muroid rodents and hamsters

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The molecular clock ticks regularly in muroid rodents and hamsters

C O'hUigin et al. J Mol Evol. 1992 Nov.

Abstract

Extensive DNA sequence data are used to compare the rates of nucleotide substitution in the mouse, rat, and hamster lineages. A relative rate test using hamster sequences as references shows that the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution in the mouse and rat lineages are nearly equal and a test using human sequences as references shows that the rates in the mouse, rat, and hamster lineages are also nearly equal. Under the assumptions that the guinea pig lineage and the myomorph (mouse, rat, and hamster) lineage diverged 70-100 million years (Myr) ago and that the rate of nucleotide substitution has been constant in all these lineages since their divergence, the date of the mouse-rat split is estimated to be between 20 and 29 Myr ago, which is considerably older than the date (approximately 12 Myr) suggested by available rodent fossils and considerably younger than the date (approximately 35 Myr) suggested by Wilson and colleagues. The murid-hamster split is estimated to be 1.6 times older than the mouse-rat split.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Mar;2(2):150-74 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1990 Jan;124(1):165-73 - PubMed
    1. Mol Biol Evol. 1991 Jan;8(1):115-27 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1989 Feb 23;337(6209):752-4 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1987 Mar 5-11;326(6108):93-6 - PubMed

Publication types