Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): evidence for an attention-shifting model
- PMID: 1494610
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01358263
Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): evidence for an attention-shifting model
Abstract
When two vertical rods move through a horizontal window in close succession, the Tandem Effect can be observed. It consists of a spatial illusion (distance between the rods looking smaller than it actually is) and a temporal illusion (under certain conditions both rods are seen simultaneously in the window, though the first rod has left the window before the second rod enters it). We report six experiments that explored the distance-reduction illusion and tested an attentional model of the effect. It assumes that attention is initially focused on the first rod and then shifted to the second, when it enters the window. The percept of the pair of rods is integrated from the first rod's position at the beginning, and the second rod's position at the end, of the focus shift. Consequently their subjective distance will be smaller than their physical distance by the distance that they travel during the focus shift. Experiments 1 and 2 established the Tandem Effect as an empirical phenomenon and showed that its size depends on stimulus parameters such as window size and movement speed. Experiments 3-5 tested specific predictions from the attentional model. Experiment 6 examined a further illusion, the Fröhlich Effect, and showed that it can be subsumed under the model. The experiments produced some unexpected effects and some predictions from the model were only partly confirmed. It is shown that the main findings can be combined into two quantitative functions that describe the course of focusing. One implication is that visual attention does not "move" from one object to another; rather all attention shifts originate in the fovea. We discuss several alternative interpretations of our data and show that they are less satisfactory than the attentional model.
Similar articles
-
Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: the Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation.Percept Psychophys. 1998 May;60(4):683-95. doi: 10.3758/bf03206055. Percept Psychophys. 1998. PMID: 9628999
-
Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation.Science. 1972 Mar 24;175(4028):1335-40. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4028.1335. Science. 1972. PMID: 5059563
-
Spatial mislocalization as a consequence of sequential coding of stimuli.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Feb;74(2):365-78. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0239-y. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012. PMID: 22090187
-
Forms of momentum across space: representational, operational, and attentional.Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1371-403. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0624-3. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014. PMID: 24917187 Review.
-
Configurational coincidence among six phenomena: a comment on van Lier and Csathó (2006).Perception. 2006;35(6):799-806. doi: 10.1068/p5319b. Perception. 2006. PMID: 16836045 Review.
Cited by
-
The influence of visual motion on perceived position.Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 May 1;6(5):211-216. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01887-9. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002. PMID: 11983584 Free PMC article.
-
Experiments on the Fehrer-Raab effect and the 'Weather Station Model' of visual backward masking.Psychol Res. 2007 Nov;71(6):667-77. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0055-5. Epub 2006 May 20. Psychol Res. 2007. PMID: 16715303
-
Neurobiological mechanisms behind the spatiotemporal illusions of awareness used for advocating prediction or postdiction.Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 4;3:593. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00593. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23293625 Free PMC article.
-
Motion misperception caused by feedback connections: a neural model simulating the Fröhlich effect.Psychol Res. 2007 Nov;71(6):709-15. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0060-8. Epub 2006 Apr 28. Psychol Res. 2007. PMID: 16645880
-
Position-dependent and position-independent attention shifts: evidence against the spotlight and premotor assumption of visual focussing.Psychol Res. 1994;56(4):251-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00419655. Psychol Res. 1994. PMID: 8090860