Effects of position and mattress overlay on sacral and heel pressures in a clinical population
- PMID: 1496149
- DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770150403
Effects of position and mattress overlay on sacral and heel pressures in a clinical population
Abstract
A comparison of pressure reducing properties of alternating air, static air, and water mattress overlays was conducted with 57 patients in a surgical intensive care unit. Sacral and heel pressures in both recumbent and semi-Fowler's positions were tested for each surface using a repeated measures design. Mean pressures for the alternating air mattress were significantly higher than pressures with other surfaces, regardless of position or site. There were significant main effects for position and site, with higher pressures in the semi-Fowler's position and at the sacral site. A significant interaction between surface, site, and position was found. Pressure sores developed in eight patients, but the incidence was not significantly different across groups. A pressure measuring device constructed from available clinical materials proved to be both sensitive and reliable. The findings suggest alternating air overlays should be avoided, and that positioning and periodic position change to reduce sacral pressures for patients requiring prolonged upper body elevation is important.
Similar articles
-
Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.J ET Nurs. 1993 May-Jun;20(3):111-5. J ET Nurs. 1993. PMID: 8347757
-
Relationship between body weight, body position, support surface, and tissue interface pressure at the sacrum.Decubitus. 1993 Jan;6(1):22-30. Decubitus. 1993. PMID: 8427641 Clinical Trial.
-
A quantitative analysis of pressure and shear in the effectiveness of support surfaces.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 1998 Sep;25(5):233-9. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 1998. PMID: 9923257 Clinical Trial.
-
Are pressure redistribution surfaces or heel protection devices effective for preventing heel pressure ulcers?J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 Nov-Dec;36(6):602-8. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181be282f. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19920740 Review.
-
Principles of alternating pressure surfaces.Adv Wound Care. 1997 Nov-Dec;10(7):30-6. Adv Wound Care. 1997. PMID: 9450404 Review.
Cited by
-
Alternative reactive support surfaces (non-foam and non-air-filled) for preventing pressure ulcers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 6;5(5):CD013623. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013623.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34097764 Free PMC article.
-
The frictional energy absorber effectiveness and its impact on the pressure ulcer prevention performance of multilayer dressings.Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14871. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14871. Int Wound J. 2024. PMID: 38591160 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 10;5(5):CD013620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013620.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33969911 Free PMC article.
-
Backrest position in prevention of pressure ulcers and ventilator-associated pneumonia: conflicting recommendations.Heart Lung. 2012 Nov-Dec;41(6):536-45. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jul 21. Heart Lung. 2012. PMID: 22819601 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preventing and treating pressure sores.Qual Health Care. 1995 Dec;4(4):289-97. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.4.289. Qual Health Care. 1995. PMID: 10156400 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical