Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Apr 10;109(3):418-24.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.11719.

Cervical cancer as a priority for prevention in different world regions: an evaluation using years of life lost

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cervical cancer as a priority for prevention in different world regions: an evaluation using years of life lost

Binh H Yang et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

The relative importance of cancer of the cervix among several important causes of mortality (from cancer and other diseases) has been evaluated by estimating the years of life lost (YLL) by young and middle-aged women (25-64 years old) in different regions of the world. The life years were weighted to reflect their importance to the individual and to society. On a global basis, cancer of the cervix is responsible for about 2% of the total (weighted) YLL, fewer than for other causes of mortality in this age group. However, it is the most important cause of YLL in Latin America and the Caribbean. It also makes the largest contribution to YLL from cancer in the populous regions of SubSaharan Africa and South-Central Asia where the actual risk of loss of life from this cause is higher, although overshadowed by noncancer deaths (from AIDS, TB and maternal conditions). The overall picture is not very sensitive to the age weighting function used. The fact that most of the loss of life is preventable, and that simple technologies have been developed that make this practicable, means that cervical cancer has an even higher profile from the perspective of resource allocation in low income settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map showing the 13 world areas studied and the population sizes of women aged 25–64 years in 2000.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The recommended and modified age-weighting functions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cause-specific total years of life lost among women aged 25–64 years for developing and developed countries, in 2000.

References

    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer. 2001;94:153–6. - PubMed
    1. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Young J. IARC Scientific Publications No. 143. VII. Lyon, France: IARC; 1997. Cancer incidence in five continents.
    1. Dempsey M. Decline in tuberculosis. The death rate fails to tell the entire story. Am Rev Tuberculosis. 1947;56:157–64. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Disease of importance in developing countries. II. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1986. New vaccine development: establishing priorities. - PubMed
    1. Lewis PA, Charny M. Which of two individuals do you treat when only their ages are different and you can’t treat both? J Med Ethics. 1989;15:28–34. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types