Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Mar;63(3):285-9.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2002.005678.

Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice

M C Lodder  1 , W F Lems, H J Ader, A E Marthinsen, S C C M van Coeverden, P Lips, J C Netelenbos, B A C Dijkmans, J C Roos
Affiliations

Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice

M C Lodder et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are frequently performed repeatedly for each patient. Subsequent BMD measurements allow reproducibility to be assessed.

Objective: To examine the reproducibility of BMD by dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to investigate the practical value of different measures of reproducibility in a group of postmenopausal women.

Methods: Ninety five women, mean age 59.9 years, underwent two subsequent BMD measurements of spine and hip. Reproducibility was expressed as smallest detectable difference (SDD), coefficient of variation (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sources of variation were investigated by multilevel analysis.

Results: The median interval between measurements was 0 days (range 0-45). The mean difference (SD) between the measurements (g/cm(2)) was -0.001 (0.02) and -0.0004 (0.02) at L1-4 and the total hip, respectively. At L1-4 and the total hip, SDD (g/cm(2)) was +/-0.05 and +/-0.04 and CV (%) was 1.92 and 1.59, respectively. The ICC at spine and hip was 0.99.

Conclusions: Reproducibility in the postmenopausal women studied was good. In a repeated DXA scan a BMD change exceeding 2 radical 2CV (%), the least significant change (LSC), or the SDD should be regarded as significant. Use of the SDD is preferable to use of the CV and LSC (%) because of its independence from BMD and its expression in absolute units. Expressed as SDD, a BMD change of at least +/-0.05 g/cm(2) at L1-4 and +/-0.04 g/cm(2) at the total hip should be considered significant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graph of the difference score against the mean score of the two total hip BMD measurements (g/cm2) in postmenopausal women (open diamonds) and children (closed squares). The outermost (solid) lines represent the 95% limits of agreement for postmenopausal women. The inner (dashed) lines represent the 95% limits of agreement for children.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph of the difference score against the mean score of the two lumbar spine BMD measurements (g/cm2) in postmenopausal women (open diamonds) and children (closed squares). The outermost (solid) lines represent the 95% limits of agreement for postmenopausal women. The inner (dashed) lines represent the 95% limits of agreement for children.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Nov;42(11):2309-18 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Aug;14(8):1449-56 - PubMed
    1. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(4):259-64 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Feb;15(2):369-72 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Jul;15(7):1368-75 - PubMed

Publication types