Similar articles

• [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications].

  Bias R. Bias R. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2001;151(1-2):39-40. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2001. PMID: 11281127 German. No abstract available.
• Association of study quality with completeness of reporting.

  McInnes M, Tunis AS. McInnes M, et al. Radiology. 2014 Jul;272(1):303-4. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140830. Radiology. 2014. PMID: 24956054 No abstract available.
• [Evaluation of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews)].

  Coenen M, Schuetz GM, Dewey M. Coenen M, et al. Rofo. 2013 Sep;184(10):937-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350140. Epub 2013 Sep 2. Rofo. 2013. PMID: 23999778 German. No abstract available.
• Literature reviews: evolution of a research methodology.

  Evans D, Kowanko I. Evans D, et al. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2000 Dec-2001 Feb;18(2):33-8. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2000. PMID: 11878498 Review.
• Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.

  Hammad TA, Neyarapally GA, Pinheiro SP, Iyasu S, Rochester G, Dal Pan G. Hammad TA, et al. Clin Trials. 2013;10(3):389-97. doi: 10.1177/1740774513479467. Epub 2013 Mar 18. Clin Trials. 2013. PMID: 23508987 Review.